Seele00TextOnly wrote:'well he's the main character, so... I as the audience am supposed to sympathize and identify with him most!'
Straw man. I don't recall anyone saying that's their reason for anything.
As for people who don't care about everyone, I can only surmise as to sociopathic tendencies and narrow backwards political views that tend to coincide with such sentiments.
And that would be Ad Hominum, your old favorite. Any more fallacies you'd like to use today?
esselfortium wrote:"Everyone" isn't a vague abstraction because it includes all the people Shinji knows personally and ostensibly cares about to some degree.
Yes, actually, it is. That's still referring to specific people, something manageable. When you try an expand it to
everyone though the human mind simply isn't capable of truely giving a shit. Oh, you might tell yourself you do and make a big show of sympathy, but that's just because you want to to
percieved as a person who cares, not because you actually do. Past about 150 or so of the people closest to you empathy just doesn't work, and there is anthropological research to back that up.
Tarnsman wrote:Really? If you watched a woman being raped, would you just ignore it and go about your business? If someone came to your door dying, would you do nothing? If you were handed a device and told that if you were you use it there was a 50% chance you would gain riches beyond your wildest dreams and a 50% chance that you would kill 1.5 billion random people, would you use it?
If a person enters into my sphere of effective action then they cease to be part of 'everyone' and become 'that person right there in front of me'. That's a HUGE difference. Of course I'd make some reasonable efforts to help like calling 911 and such, or perhaps administering some help personally if I had the slightest idea how to do so or in the case of the rapist if I felt I could do so without undue risk to myself.
As to the device, I'd really need some more information. As stated I'd assume it was a joke, because that's just stupid. Who exactly is it going to kill, how, and how likely are they to die soon anyway? What will their deaths actually affect on a global scale? How much money are we actually talking about, and do I have to spend it only on myself or can I use this potentially infinite wealth to build a global paradise for the survivors? Destructive events like forest fires are a necessary part of a healthy ecosystem, afterall.