Rebuild is shallow [split]
Moderators: Rebuild/OT Moderators, Board Staff
Forum rules
By visiting this forum, you agree to read the rules for discussion.
By visiting this forum, you agree to read the rules for discussion.
Rebuild is shallow [split]
1.0 and 2.0 were fun. 2.0's deviations from NGE were pretty good although I don't like what was done to Asuka's character. Some things lead me to believe it might make more sense in 3.0+1.0, but as of now her character arc in the rebuilds is just bad. Everything except the aesthetic level of her personality was taken away. Maybe you can't show suicide and 4-year-olds suffering in a film designed to sell Mari figurines. Hopefully that's not it and there is a better reason which will be revealed in the finale.
3.0 was wholesale awful. The character redesigns are ugly, the setting is ugly, the plot is not stimulating, the protagonist is treated like a leper by everyone and it's never justified in any clearly defined terms. Everything people enjoyed about NGE is absent here.
3.0 was wholesale awful. The character redesigns are ugly, the setting is ugly, the plot is not stimulating, the protagonist is treated like a leper by everyone and it's never justified in any clearly defined terms. Everything people enjoyed about NGE is absent here.
- pwhodges
- A Lilin in Wonderland
- Age: 77
- Posts: 11035
- Joined: Nov 18, 2012
- Location: Oxford, UK
- Contact:
Re: A decade has gone by since the first Rebuild film (Jo)....
That's just reiterating the complaints of those who want NTE to be a rehash of NGE because they lack the imagination to see beyond that. It isn't; things are different because it's a different story.
"Being human, having your health; that's what's important." (from: Magical Shopping Arcade Abenobashi )
"As long as we're all living, and as long as we're all having fun, that should do it, right?" (from: The Eccentric Family )
Avatar: The end of the journey (details); Past avatars.
Before 3.0+1.0 there was Afterwards... my post-Q Evangelion fanfic (discussion)
"As long as we're all living, and as long as we're all having fun, that should do it, right?" (from: The Eccentric Family )
Avatar: The end of the journey (details); Past avatars.
Before 3.0+1.0 there was Afterwards... my post-Q Evangelion fanfic (discussion)
- The Eva Monkey
- IT'S OVER 9000!!!
- Posts: 9109
- Joined: Jun 14, 2004
- Location: The Evanets.
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Re: A decade has gone by since the first Rebuild film (Jo)....
I disagree, it is possible to be different while still providing proper exposition and characterization.
As has been pointed out in the past, Asuka in Rebuild has almost no backstory or characterization, it's summed up by a brief scene with her talking to a hand puppet. They take no time to develop her or explain why she is the way she is. To me, that's bad storytelling.
For a series that is so revered for its strong and iconic characters, I find it very ironic that they didn't take the time to develop any of the characters in Rebuild.
Also, if they had taken five minutes to explain to Shinji what in the hell is going on, maybe they would have avoided all of the conflict in the first place. But I guess then they wouldn't have a film.
Hopefully they'll actually do some of that in the next film. Hopefully.
Re: A decade has gone by since the first Rebuild film (Jo)....
Shinij and Rei II are extensively developed, Kaworu is even more developed than he was in the TV show.
Asuka and Mari are the only characters that at the moment I feel are underdeveloped in my opinion (in Asuka's case development is there, but it lacks a backstory to make sense of it). The adults are secondary/minor characters and I don't expect/want significant amount of screentime dedicated to them in the last film.
Last edited by Joseki on Sat Sep 30, 2017 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: A decade has gone by since the first Rebuild film (Jo)....
I agree with you. I suspect it might have been done on purpose to give more options to what happens next in the story, yet that is just speculation from my part. It wouldn't make sense to me to take such an approach, but maybe for them it would.
Fuyutsuki did nothing wrong.
- FreakyFilmFan4ever
- (In)Sufficient Director
- Age: 36
- Posts: 9897
- Joined: Jun 09, 2009
- Location: Playing amongst the stars
- Gender: Male
Re: A decade has gone by since the first Rebuild film (Jo)....
The Eva Monkey wrote:I disagree, it is possible to be different while still providing proper exposition and characterization.
As has been pointed out in the past, Asuka in Rebuild has almost no backstory or characterization, it's summed up by a brief scene with her talking to a hand puppet. They take no time to develop her or explain why she is the way she is. To me, that's bad storytelling.
Why does Shikinami need any of that? Hikari was similarly “disserviced” in NGE’s narrative, and her character doesn’t feel stifled by bad storytelling. Shikinami in NTE is just like Ritsuko in the same series, or Maya in NGE; she is just as developed as she needs to be in order to be a supporting cast member. NTE doesn’t have an ensemble main cast like NGE did. The new movies don’t focus on a group of 5+ characters to the point where they all become “main characters.” Instead, NTE is all about Misato and Shinji. Therefore, the non-Shinji/Misato characters don’t need the same amount of character development as the main two cast members do.
If it’s bad storytelling for movies to have only two main characters while 15+ other warm bodies play supporting roles, maybe we just need to stop making and watching movies all together.
Rebuild is shallow tangent
That's because Hikari isn't a main character, lol.
I'm starting to believe there's something anomalous about Asuka in Rebuild. There are strange things about her.
1) No mention of her backstory at all. Fond for dolls now.
2) Different last name.
3) No core on her plugsuit. Every single plugsuit except hers has one or more cores. Even when Mari uses EVA-02 her plugsuit has a core.
I don't have a good guess, maybe something will be revealed in 3.0+1.0 which explains what's going on with Asuka. Something related to the looping timeline possibly.
Re: A decade has gone by since the first Rebuild film (Jo)....
This is quite the point Freaky is trying to make about Asuka in Rebuild. She's not a main character.
- pwhodges
- A Lilin in Wonderland
- Age: 77
- Posts: 11035
- Joined: Nov 18, 2012
- Location: Oxford, UK
- Contact:
Re: A decade has gone by since the first Rebuild film (Jo)....
As I said above it is not the same story, and and as you say: nor is it being told the same way. It may be hard to put NGE out of mind while watching the films, but for some people it seems that it really does get in the way of properly appreciating the new experience.
"Being human, having your health; that's what's important." (from: Magical Shopping Arcade Abenobashi )
"As long as we're all living, and as long as we're all having fun, that should do it, right?" (from: The Eccentric Family )
Avatar: The end of the journey (details); Past avatars.
Before 3.0+1.0 there was Afterwards... my post-Q Evangelion fanfic (discussion)
"As long as we're all living, and as long as we're all having fun, that should do it, right?" (from: The Eccentric Family )
Avatar: The end of the journey (details); Past avatars.
Before 3.0+1.0 there was Afterwards... my post-Q Evangelion fanfic (discussion)
- FreakyFilmFan4ever
- (In)Sufficient Director
- Age: 36
- Posts: 9897
- Joined: Jun 09, 2009
- Location: Playing amongst the stars
- Gender: Male
A decade has gone by since the first Rebuild film (Jo)....
^ Exactly. I've been showing people unfamiliar with Eva the NTE series before showing them the original TV series. The result is that nobody complains about the lack of development in characters that aren't Shinji or Misato. They aren't expecting there to be any, and the movies don't give a pretense of that expectation. So, if NTE doesn't give the pretense of character development on characters that aren't Shinji or Misato, why do people who have seen NGE feel disappointed by the lack of character development in these supporting cast members?
The answer is nostalgia, and complaints from the older, more established fans about the newer fan base "not getting" why Shikinami needs character development stem from juvenoia. It's really that simple. These aren't invalid reasons to not care for Shikinami in the "Rebuilds," but they aren't stable foundations upon which to accuse someone of "bad story-telling" either. It has nothing to do with the technicalities or the sensibilities of the story-telling present within the movies themselves.
How so?
The answer is nostalgia, and complaints from the older, more established fans about the newer fan base "not getting" why Shikinami needs character development stem from juvenoia. It's really that simple. These aren't invalid reasons to not care for Shikinami in the "Rebuilds," but they aren't stable foundations upon which to accuse someone of "bad story-telling" either. It has nothing to do with the technicalities or the sensibilities of the story-telling present within the movies themselves.
How so?
- Gendo'sPapa
- Committeeperson
- Age: 39
- Posts: 5599
- Joined: Oct 24, 2006
- Gender: Male
Re: Rebuild is shallow tangent
Ah, this old thing again.
I've made my point in other threads. The Rebuild films aren't shallow, they're just going about telling their message in a different way & not relying so much on characters directly stating their feelings to camera in elaborate skirting around budgetary restraints dream sequences. It's a much different experience but it's hardly "shallow", a word people like to throw out whenever they can to grab attention. It does work. The films require the audience to be more engaged as Anno is actually doing some subtle work for once while still making his broadest spectacle driven features yet loaded with action scenes.
And the old "Asuka is not as fully developed a character as in NGE" is an old bit of nonsense that is probably never going to go away. Ah well. Asuka was arguably the second lead in NGE. That's not the case in Rebuild, she's 100% a supporting character (one who - like Misato - actually showcases some subtle character animation acting in 3.33 which is a first for Eva) & anyones inability to reconcile with that is them brining their own bias to the new films. Asuka has shown a perfectly fine character arch befitting her role as a supporting character. But, despite her prominence in marketing & all in the end she is still just a supporting character this time around. If one had to rank the characters in terms of importance to the story being told she'd probably rank 5th or 6th overall, a major change from her status as essentially the co-lead of the original anime.
Funny how everyone knocks Rebuild for Asuka while at the same time the film series (in my eyes) completely saves my most least favorite element of NGE - Kaworu Nagisa - and actually makes him a compelling & robust character instead of just being a plot device.
All this continued retreading about how the Rebuilds are shallow for not spending all it's time beefing up the supporting cast REALLY makes me hope Anno double downs on everything in Final & literally makes the whole movie nothing but Shinji Ikari. ....Which I kind of expect he's going to do anyway because 3.0 makes it VERY obvious that the film series more than the TV series IS Shinji Ikari's story.
I've made my point in other threads. The Rebuild films aren't shallow, they're just going about telling their message in a different way & not relying so much on characters directly stating their feelings to camera in elaborate skirting around budgetary restraints dream sequences. It's a much different experience but it's hardly "shallow", a word people like to throw out whenever they can to grab attention. It does work. The films require the audience to be more engaged as Anno is actually doing some subtle work for once while still making his broadest spectacle driven features yet loaded with action scenes.
And the old "Asuka is not as fully developed a character as in NGE" is an old bit of nonsense that is probably never going to go away. Ah well. Asuka was arguably the second lead in NGE. That's not the case in Rebuild, she's 100% a supporting character (one who - like Misato - actually showcases some subtle character animation acting in 3.33 which is a first for Eva) & anyones inability to reconcile with that is them brining their own bias to the new films. Asuka has shown a perfectly fine character arch befitting her role as a supporting character. But, despite her prominence in marketing & all in the end she is still just a supporting character this time around. If one had to rank the characters in terms of importance to the story being told she'd probably rank 5th or 6th overall, a major change from her status as essentially the co-lead of the original anime.
Funny how everyone knocks Rebuild for Asuka while at the same time the film series (in my eyes) completely saves my most least favorite element of NGE - Kaworu Nagisa - and actually makes him a compelling & robust character instead of just being a plot device.
All this continued retreading about how the Rebuilds are shallow for not spending all it's time beefing up the supporting cast REALLY makes me hope Anno double downs on everything in Final & literally makes the whole movie nothing but Shinji Ikari. ....Which I kind of expect he's going to do anyway because 3.0 makes it VERY obvious that the film series more than the TV series IS Shinji Ikari's story.
- FreakyFilmFan4ever
- (In)Sufficient Director
- Age: 36
- Posts: 9897
- Joined: Jun 09, 2009
- Location: Playing amongst the stars
- Gender: Male
Re: Rebuild is shallow tangent
Regarding the fact that the New Theatrical Evangelion focuses on Shinji’s story and leaves everyone else as supporting cast memebers, I wrote in length about that here, but will only quote a portion of it in this thread.
- Cybermat47
- Clockiel
- Age: 24
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Jun 20, 2017
- Location: NSW, Australia
- Gender: Male
Re: Rebuild is shallow tangent
I think that less focus on Asuka is good. Don't get me wrong, I think she's a great character, but let's be honest - Rei really got the short end of the stick. She had barely any presence between episode 6 and her second death.
I much prefer Rei's story in RoE.
I much prefer Rei's story in RoE.
Reichu wrote:It’s all weird and phallic.
- CommanderFish
- Shamshel
- Age: 24
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Jul 31, 2016
- Gender: Male
Re: Rebuild is shallow tangent
Gendo'sPapa wrote:The films require the audience to be more engaged as Anno is actually doing some subtle work for once while still making his broadest spectacle driven features yet loaded with action scenes.
I am completely lost when it comes to this mindset. In what ways is NTE more subtle than NGE? (I'm not necessarily asking you in particular but more so anyone who may hold this opinion).
"The fate of destruction is also the joy of rebirth"
- FreakyFilmFan4ever
- (In)Sufficient Director
- Age: 36
- Posts: 9897
- Joined: Jun 09, 2009
- Location: Playing amongst the stars
- Gender: Male
Re: Rebuild is shallow tangent
NTE’s larger budget doesn’t only give its audience more spectacular battle scenes, but it also gives audience more detailed character animation. As a result more nuanced things are conveyed through character blocking and movement than they were for the original TV series. Compare this to episodes 16, 25, and 26 in NGE, where characters are literally given a plateform where they can speak their mind plainly, simply, and openly.
This isn’t to say that the new movies and TV series don’t use both techniques to tell their stories. Episode 4 of NGE is a really good (and rare) example in the TV series where nearly all of Shinji's development is shown through voiceless animation and isn’t dictated via dialogue. And there are plenty of scenes in Ha and Jo where Shinji discussing things on “The Eva Train.” But the new movies certainly use more blocking and animation to convey development than ever before, while the TV series still relies more on dialogue than it does on visuals to achieve the same thing.
To recite a (perhaps clumsily overused) film proverb quoted on this forum before, “Show, don’t tell.” When it comes to character development, NTE can afford to do more showing than telling than NGE could.
This isn’t to say that the new movies and TV series don’t use both techniques to tell their stories. Episode 4 of NGE is a really good (and rare) example in the TV series where nearly all of Shinji's development is shown through voiceless animation and isn’t dictated via dialogue. And there are plenty of scenes in Ha and Jo where Shinji discussing things on “The Eva Train.” But the new movies certainly use more blocking and animation to convey development than ever before, while the TV series still relies more on dialogue than it does on visuals to achieve the same thing.
To recite a (perhaps clumsily overused) film proverb quoted on this forum before, “Show, don’t tell.” When it comes to character development, NTE can afford to do more showing than telling than NGE could.
- CommanderFish
- Shamshel
- Age: 24
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Jul 31, 2016
- Gender: Male
Re: Rebuild is shallow tangent
FreakyFilmFan4ever wrote:NTE’s larger budget doesn’t only give its audience more spectacular battle scenes, but it also gives audience more detailed character animation. As a result more nuanced things are conveyed through character blocking and movement than they were for the original TV series.
Okay...
I mean, I get where you're coming from but I'm not really seeing it tbh. Of course if it's really that subtle then I suppose it would be doing its job in that respect, but regardless I have yet to see anything all too profound come through by way of these avenues (relative to NGE, of course; I do not for a second believe that the Rebuilds are inherently poor or shallow).
"The fate of destruction is also the joy of rebirth"
- FreakyFilmFan4ever
- (In)Sufficient Director
- Age: 36
- Posts: 9897
- Joined: Jun 09, 2009
- Location: Playing amongst the stars
- Gender: Male
Re: Rebuild is shallow tangent
Well, we were just discussing NTE’s subtlety. Nobody was extolling NTE for its profundity. (Yet. It kind of takes a completed story in order to detect any profound declarations, especially when a series isn’t as episodically segmented as NGE was.)
- Asuka'sBigBrother
- Banned
- Age: 23
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Oct 20, 2017
- Location: Nueva Yorke
- Gender: Male
- Contact:
Re: A decade has gone by since the first Rebuild film (Jo)....
Except it isn't. It literally takes the place of NGE, it's a reboot
Simply put, if Anno wanted to make a different story, he should have made a different story, or build off the incredibly well written story that already existed. Instead Anno, replaced a very well written story with a far worse version of it.
In the end Anno has the right to do whatever he wants, but we also retain the right to criticize the hell out of it if what he does is bad. And that's exactly what's happening here.
Just a big bro looking out for sistah
Mess with this crew, and I'll give you a blister
Mess with this crew, and I'll give you a blister
- Arcadia's legacy
- Nerv Employee
- Age: 27
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: Jun 12, 2015
- Location: United Kingdom
- Gender: Male
Re: A decade has gone by since the first Rebuild film (Jo)....
It's possible to reboot an existing franchise whilst telling a very different story, with Captain Harlock as an example accomplishing this several times
Never let the flame that is hope burn out, for despite the length of the night, the sunrise will always come
""Trolling the audience" is the same thing as "challenging the audience" (to an audience that doesn't want to be challenged)." -Reichu
""Trolling the audience" is the same thing as "challenging the audience" (to an audience that doesn't want to be challenged)." -Reichu
Return to “Rebuild of Evangelion Discussion”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests