Confused about Carddass' angelic numbering

For serious and at times in-depth discussions only, covering the original TV series, the movies End of Evangelion and Death & Rebirth.

Moderator: Board Staff

Forum rules
By visiting this forum, you agree to read the rules for discussion and abide by them.
Merkaba
Sachiel
Sachiel
User avatar
Age: 35
Posts: 236
Joined: Jun 11, 2012
Location: Tokyo-3, MI

Confused about Carddass' angelic numbering

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Merkaba » Wed Aug 22, 2012 10:20 am

So I was looking for some Eva merch on eBay, and I came across a Carddass card set. While viewing the product images, I noticed one of the card's labels Adam as the Second Angel.

I've always thought Adam was the First, and I even confirmed it on the Wiki here. But why would Carddass, who I assume had an official license for Eva, say that Adam was the Second?

Here's the link:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/NEON-GENESIS-EVANGELION-BOTH-SIDE-PRINTED-CARDS-from-JAPAN-/180957749250?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item2a21ec2002#ht_3276wt_1069

Notice, however, that the card identifies the other Angels by their names, whereas that card is blank.

Now that I've been trying to piece this post together, I'm wondering - was Lilith really the Second Angel, or is that just an assumption we've always made? Was the nameless Giant of Light a separate entity from, but commonly confused for, Adam, and the true Second Angel?

Reichu
Admin Emeritus
Admin Emeritus
Posts: 24046
Joined: Aug 21, 2004
Location: Sailing for the white shores
Gender: Female
Contact:

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Reichu » Wed Aug 22, 2012 11:50 am

We can say with good confidence that it's a weird mistake. If there was ever any doubt from the show's numerous hints that Adam = Giant of Light, EoE spelled it out (cf. Misato's expository speech to Shinji). Furthermore, higher-ranking supplementary sources make it quite explicit that the Giant of Light is Adam is the First Angel, and that Lilith is the Second Angel. The error on the cards is especially strange since they're showcasing NGE2 content (the F-Type Equipment), and NGE2 contradicts what the cards say in very clear terms.
Last edited by Reichu on Wed Aug 22, 2012 1:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
さらば、全てのEvaGeeks。
「滅びの運命は新生の喜びでもある」
Departure Message | The Arqa Apocrypha: An Evangelion Analysis Blog

Merkaba
Sachiel
Sachiel
User avatar
Age: 35
Posts: 236
Joined: Jun 11, 2012
Location: Tokyo-3, MI

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Merkaba » Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:12 pm

Reichu, I've noticed that quite often, you're able to translate Japanese (apologies if the language has a different name) to English. Is there any way you can do so for the entire card?

I'm also curious why they left the name of the angel off the card. Thoughts?

Reichu
Admin Emeritus
Admin Emeritus
Posts: 24046
Joined: Aug 21, 2004
Location: Sailing for the white shores
Gender: Female
Contact:

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Reichu » Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:46 pm

Absolutely no thoughts on why the name was left off. The whole thing makes it look like the folks responsible for that card set missed some very critical memos. Thinking that the absentee Second Angel = Giant of Light =/= Adam is the sort of hypothesis one might come up with while partway through the show. Carddass letting this get through was just plain shabby work.

As for what it actually says, I can't give you anything precise because the text is so blurry and I'm not THAT good, but it's something like, "Allegedly discovered in Antarctica and caused Second Impact. (kanji) "Giant of Light", but/however, (????), afterward the (????) Eva Series were created (?in its spittin' image?)".
Last edited by Reichu on Wed Aug 22, 2012 1:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
さらば、全てのEvaGeeks。
「滅びの運命は新生の喜びでもある」
Departure Message | The Arqa Apocrypha: An Evangelion Analysis Blog

JoeD80
Gaghiel
Gaghiel
Posts: 395
Joined: Jan 08, 2010
Location: Los Angeles

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby JoeD80 » Wed Aug 22, 2012 1:14 pm

Well in that set card 28 is 1st angel Adam and card 45 is Lilith with no Angel numbering.

Merkaba
Sachiel
Sachiel
User avatar
Age: 35
Posts: 236
Joined: Jun 11, 2012
Location: Tokyo-3, MI

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Merkaba » Thu Sep 13, 2012 4:44 pm

It happened again...

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Evangelion-Neon-Genesis-2nd-Angel-Giant-of-Light-Kubrick-Medicom-GAINAX-Box-set-/120984691389?pt=US_Action_Figures&hash=item1c2b3fe2bd

This time, it's a Kubrick toy saying that the "Giant of Light" is the Second Angel. Why would two companies, both officially licensed mid-to-late-90s merchandisers, claim that the Second Angel isn't Lilith, and is instead the Giant of Light?

Tribblepoo
Israfel
Israfel
User avatar
Age: 47
Posts: 483
Joined: Mar 02, 2012
Location: Head is firmly up...nevermind.
Gender: Male

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Tribblepoo » Thu Sep 13, 2012 6:29 pm

Jesus, people (especially merchandisers) are still making this mistake with a show that is damn near 20 years old?

Research, people. Fucking research.
"Having sex with extreme gas must be how the Scots came up with the idea for bagpipes."

Merkaba
Sachiel
Sachiel
User avatar
Age: 35
Posts: 236
Joined: Jun 11, 2012
Location: Tokyo-3, MI

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Merkaba » Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:50 pm

Is there anything that explicitly says that Lilith is the Second Angel? The Dead Sea Scrolls are what seem to give the numbering of the Angels, and I'm wondering why, if Lilith arrived first (First Impact), she would be the Second, interrupting the flow of Adam and her decedents that come in a specific order.

Ornette
Administrator
Administrator
User avatar
Age: 49
Posts: 11887
Joined: Dec 26, 2005
Location: Pittsburgh/New York City
Gender: Male
Contact:

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Ornette » Fri Sep 14, 2012 12:58 am

View Original PostMerkaba wrote:Is there anything that explicitly says that Lilith is the Second Angel?

Not within the show I don't think, though I think the first explicit instance was in one of the cards. Not that it wasn't pretty obvious who the 2nd was.

Merkaba
Sachiel
Sachiel
User avatar
Age: 35
Posts: 236
Joined: Jun 11, 2012
Location: Tokyo-3, MI

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Merkaba » Fri Sep 14, 2012 7:53 am

Not within the show I don't think, though I think the first explicit instance was in one of the cards.


Recall what the first post of this thread was, though. It was a card that said "The Giant of Light" was the Second Angel. What makes one card more reliable than the other?

Not that it wasn't pretty obvious who the 2nd was.


It's actually not that obvious. Adam is an Angel who had Angel children. Lilith is a/n (?) that had Lilim children. Why would both be Angels if they had separate types of offspring?[/quote]

Hyper Shinchan
Younger God
Younger God
User avatar
Age: 36
Posts: 4774
Joined: Aug 07, 2005
Location: Bunga Bunga Republic
Gender: Male

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Hyper Shinchan » Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:15 am

View Original PostMerkaba wrote:It's actually not that obvious. Adam is an Angel who had Angel children. Lilith is a/n (?) that had Lilim children. Why would both be Angels if they had separate types of offspring?

Because of what Misato said in Air:
SPOILER: Show
Image
So let’s make a wish.
“Please let me redo again.”
No matter how many times

From the book “All About Nagisa Kaworu: A Child of Evangelion”.

Merkaba
Sachiel
Sachiel
User avatar
Age: 35
Posts: 236
Joined: Jun 11, 2012
Location: Tokyo-3, MI

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Merkaba » Fri Sep 14, 2012 8:55 am

I thought there was debate as to whether that was literal or not. Why would we be the 18th Angels if we were around before the other Angels woke up (and their numbering comes from the order of their arrivals/attacks)?

Hyper Shinchan
Younger God
Younger God
User avatar
Age: 36
Posts: 4774
Joined: Aug 07, 2005
Location: Bunga Bunga Republic
Gender: Male

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Hyper Shinchan » Fri Sep 14, 2012 9:26 am

Well, maybe Angels were created before First Impact, although Tabris would still contradict the enumeration even if it were the case. It's easier that it was just Seele's decision to either skip Lilim altogether or place them as 18th Angel if we take Misato's words literally, like I'm prone to do.
So let’s make a wish.
“Please let me redo again.”
No matter how many times

From the book “All About Nagisa Kaworu: A Child of Evangelion”.

ShIiNjI
Embryo
User avatar
Age: 32
Posts: 39
Joined: Sep 16, 2011
Location: Italy
Gender: Male

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby ShIiNjI » Fri Sep 14, 2012 12:03 pm

View Original PostMerkaba wrote:Is there anything that explicitly says that Lilith is the Second Angel? The Dead Sea Scrolls are what seem to give the numbering of the Angels, and I'm wondering why, if Lilith arrived first (First Impact), she would be the Second, interrupting the flow of Adam and her decedents that come in a specific order.

I think that they use the terms "1st", "2nd", "3rd", etc. to identify the Angels depending on the order they meet them, hence Adam is the first and Lilith the second (and, as example, that is why Sachiel isn't the Third Angel in Rebuild). The Scrolls probably just says that 15 of Adam's offspring will come and raise the hell up before 3I.

View Original PostMerkaba wrote:I thought there was debate as to whether that was literal or not. Why would we be the 18th Angels if we were around before the other Angels woke up (and their numbering comes from the order of their arrivals/attacks)?

On the premise that I completely agree with the idea that "Angel" actually may refers to all beings whose origin is ultimately traceable to the First Ancestral Race [took from the Wiki]. After Misato found the truth about 2I and everything else, being aware that Angels and humans have lots in common, she probably just picks up the first number available... In the same way I could say that cats are the 19th Angel :/


Return to “Evangelion TV Series + EoE Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests