Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

Discussion of the new series of Evangelion movies ( "Evangelion Shin Gekijōban", meaning "Evangelion: New Theatrical Edition"). The final instalment made its debut in Japan on March 8, 2021.

Moderators: Rebuild/OT Moderators, Board Staff

Forum rules
By visiting this forum, you agree to read the rules for discussion.
PEN2PEN
Embryo
User avatar
Posts: 5
Joined: Nov 17, 2025

Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby PEN2PEN » Sat Dec 20, 2025 2:42 pm

Image

It has been mentioned that the silhouette belongs to one of the Mass Production Eva from EOE and that Rebuild is a sequel to NGE; however:

In the Rebuild 1.0 Records Collection, the production notes mention that this scene was the result of the Second Impact.

Image

In 2.0, during his visit with Kaji, Shinji mentions on two occasions that the oceans before the Second Impact were blue.

It's impossible that the bloodstain where the silhouette is located to remain intact on the ground for so long, which indicates the stain belongs to an event from 15 years ago rather than one that occurred thousands or millions of years in the past (EOE).

Image

Therefore, the theory that the silhouette corresponds to a Mass Production Eva is ruled out.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

During the Second Impact, there were no Evas or Angels. As a result, the silhouette belongs to one of the Adams from the Second Impact.

One of the Adams fell onto the Moon, and another ended up on the coast of Japan as a result of a massive blood explosion that occurred on the Antarctic continent.

Image


Details still unexplained:
The buildings appear to form a spiral/whirlpool. It seems as if the ground, for some unknown reason, were trying to swallow something.

Image

Weird_ocean
Lilith
User avatar
Posts: 126
Joined: Sep 22, 2024
Gender: Male

Re: Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Weird_ocean » Sat Dec 20, 2025 4:19 pm

I think it was obvious from the start that the spot on the moon and a figure in the 1.0 has nothing to do with EOE and is just a red herring. The figure outlined as well as the blood stain on the moon come from 2 of the Adams, not the remnants of the EOE. Even the the blood stain on the moon looks different. The one in EOE looks more like a splash, while the one in Rebuilds is more of a line. Also, there is no blood ring in Rebuilds around earth which was present in the last shots of EOE. All of this tells me that the supposed continuity from EOE to Rebuilds, is nothing but a bunch of easter eggs by Anno, to give EVA fans some red herrings and bred crumbs to follow, eventually leading nowhere. I mean the Book of life is the best we got, and it is never explained or elaborated on. Anno is notorious for this kind of thing. Hinting to things without any kind of proper build up. Like Asuka's suit with a tape where she was injured in EOE and her having an eye patch. I mean it has also runes from Nadia of the blue water and the music from there, it doesn't really mean anything, because Nadia lore and NGE lore are not compatible. No one should take Rebuilds lore seriously, because it's really just Anno pushing all sorts of nonsense into the EVA lore without actually connecting or explaining things. Those are just easter eggs and callbacks with no rhyme or reason, just like all the callbacks in the Minus-space, to NGE and EOE that, again, were never explained. Anno seriously doesn't care about keeping the lore consistent or coherent, it's just a bunch of shit put together for nerds to scratch their heads about with no actual connection or conclusion. EOE and rebuilds cannot be connected in a continuity. Rebuilds is not sequel but a remake\alternative universe and it's the best way to see it as such.
Last edited by Weird_ocean on Sun Dec 21, 2025 8:55 am, edited 2 times in total.

Jinroh
Leliel
Leliel
User avatar
Age: 42
Posts: 712
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland
Gender: Male

Re: Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Jinroh » Sun Dec 21, 2025 8:28 am

View Original PostWeird_ocean wrote:Those are just easter eggs and callbacks with no rhyme and reason, just like all the callbacks in the Minus-space, to NGE and EOE that, again, were never explained. Anno seriously doesn't care about keeping the lore consistent or coherent, it's just a bunch of shit put together for nerds to scratch their heads about with no actual connection or conclusion. EOE and rebuilds cannot be connected in a continuity. Rebuilds is not sequel but a remake\alternative universe and it's the best way to see it as such.

It's very reminiscent of JJ's infamous mystery box. I know some people here disagree with it, but I'm pretty sure Anno himself doesn't have any answer to most of these "mysteries". A lot of it is just probably for the rule of cool.

Weird_ocean
Lilith
User avatar
Posts: 126
Joined: Sep 22, 2024
Gender: Male

Re: Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Weird_ocean » Sun Dec 21, 2025 8:55 am

View Original PostJinroh wrote:It's very reminiscent of JJ's infamous mystery box. I know some people here disagree with it, but I'm pretty sure Anno himself doesn't have any answer to most of these "mysteries". A lot of it is just probably for the rule of cool.


I think so too. Anno is known for changing and coming up with things on the fly. I'm pretty sure in NGE also, a lot of things were added like Lilith and Adam's embryo to figure out later what they are, and they did the same thing with Rebuilds in many cases. Like I'm pretty sure the whole Mari being Yui's and Gendo's friend was only figured out during the production of 3.0, or Asuka being a clone. They really figure it out as they go, but I guess at least in the case of NGE they were willing to put it all together in the end in EOE. While in Rebuilds they just gave up.

Axx°N N.
Bardiel
Bardiel
User avatar
Posts: 752
Joined: Dec 31, 2020
Location: Up a tree
Gender: Male

Re: Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Axx°N N. » Wed Dec 24, 2025 10:11 pm

View Original PostWeird_ocean wrote:Like I'm pretty sure the whole Mari being Yui's and Gendo's friend was only figured out during the production of 3.0...

In this case I think it's a really weird 'franchise drift' kind of thing ... you know, like how there was a Silent Hill film that differed heavily in aesthetics, but then those differences were more or less canonized because then the games took those aesthetics and injected them into the game world.

I think Sadamoto independently ran with what he thought the photograph in Q must have meant, and did his thoroughly non-canon (according to him) omake ... and then it ends up being essentially canon because at some point in development of the films, Sadamoto turned out to have actually been the only one to bother and try to make Mari into anything, so they were like, well, why not?
Après moi le déluge!

Weird_ocean
Lilith
User avatar
Posts: 126
Joined: Sep 22, 2024
Gender: Male

Re: Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Weird_ocean » Thu Dec 25, 2025 6:15 am

View Original PostAxx°N N. wrote:Sadamoto turned out to have actually been the only one to bother and try to make Mari into anything, so they were like, well, why not?


I Don't think the timeline adds up. 3.0 was released in 2012 and Mari was added to the manga in 2014 in extra chapters, if I'm not mistaken. So fanservice it is, to sell some units.

Axx°N N.
Bardiel
Bardiel
User avatar
Posts: 752
Joined: Dec 31, 2020
Location: Up a tree
Gender: Male

Re: Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Axx°N N. » Thu Dec 25, 2025 9:00 pm

View Original PostWeird_ocean wrote:I Don't think the timeline adds up. 3.0 was released in 2012 and Mari was added to the manga in 2014 in extra chapters, if I'm not mistaken. So fanservice it is, to sell some units.

No no no ... I wasn't clear at all (sorry!) but what I meant was that my assumption is the photo in Q was a placeholder and they hadn't figured out anything concrete. And then Sadamoto ran with it for his omake, and then they ran with how he ran with it in lieu of coming up with anything else.

It's a big assumption, but there's behind-the-scenes blurbs of how they wrote Mari's scenes in at least the first 2 films without knowing what to do with her ultimately, so it's not a stretch to include the Q photo too.
Après moi le déluge!

Weird_ocean
Lilith
User avatar
Posts: 126
Joined: Sep 22, 2024
Gender: Male

Re: Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Weird_ocean » Fri Dec 26, 2025 5:50 am

View Original PostAxx°N N. wrote:No no no ... I wasn't clear at all (sorry!) but what I meant was that my assumption is the photo in Q was a placeholder and they hadn't figured out anything concrete.


I mean we still don't know anything about the person on the photo. People say it's Mari, but her hair looks like Asuka's. So, again, another set up that was just abandoned. I think it would be more interesting if it had something to do with Asuka, like her Original, but I don't think we will ever know.

About the Mari thing in 3.0. I was not talking about the photo, it was her dialog when she's talking to Rei Q "You know, your original was a lot easier to deal with." She is obviously talking about Yui here, because Yui is the original of the Ayanami clone series, which proves that she has memories of that time. So to me the whole Mari going way back with Gendo and Yui was established in 3.0 and Sadamoto who was part of the team, knew about it, and put this in his manga. That is my guess at least.

But this connection in the end not used to establish her character or tell any kind of story, it's just a mystery for the sake of mystery. And it is also incredibly convoluted. She doesn't show sings of recognizing Shinji in 2.0, but after the 14-year gap, that plotline suddenly appears. So, it adds another layer of the clone programming/memory manipulation. And it was also mentioned in 3.0 about Shinji's memories being erased.

Like, the implication of that is huge: clones and possibly people can have their memories altered in a significant way, and be uploaded into one's brain completely rewriting and altering their consciousness.

But, here also, I don't even see point in seriously discussing it, because it was just a way to cover a pothole, obviously. They just didn't know what to do with Mari in 2.0 and retconned her origin story, without even giving enough information about how she got the original Mari's memories. Same thing happened with Rei q in the village when it was revealed that she programmed to love Shinji.
That is an obvious retcon, because in 3.0 Shinji and Rei Q didn't even have enough time to establish any relationships. They didn't do anything to set up Rey Q and Shinji's connection in 3.0 and then when they started producing Shin they decided that Rei Q needs to be nice to and take care of Shinji in the Village 3. "Of fuck, we didn't do anything to get them close in 3.0 because we really wanted to show how Kaworu and Shinji play piano. What should we do? I know! All Rei clones are programmed to love Shinji!" That is so stupid.

Can you imagine Gendo, More than 14 years before that (!!!) decided to program all Rei clones to love his son! And Asuka somehow knows about it? And he did it to basically torture his son, so that there will be a crazy chance that Rei Q will follow Shinji to the village, will not receive her dose of LCL, and explode right in front of his eyes, so that he would feel the same pain Gendo did when he lost Yui. WHAT. THE. FUCK. This is so stupid. How can anyone treat this movie seriously after that retcon?
Last edited by Weird_ocean on Sat Dec 27, 2025 7:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Axx°N N.
Bardiel
Bardiel
User avatar
Posts: 752
Joined: Dec 31, 2020
Location: Up a tree
Gender: Male

Re: Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Axx°N N. » Fri Dec 26, 2025 3:49 pm

View Original PostWeird_ocean wrote:Can you imagine Gendo, More than 14 years before that (!!!) decided to program all Rei clones to love his son! And Asuka somehow knows about it? And he did it to basically torture his son, so that there will be a crazy chance that Rei Q will follow Shinji to the village, will not receive her dose of LCL, and explode right in front of his eyes, so that he would feel the same pain Gendo did when he lost Yui. WHAT. THE. FUCK. This is so stupid. How can anyone treat this movie seriously after that retcon?

This is probably my least favorite element of Rebuild. I don't know what plot beat is the event horizon, but as of Shin we're far past the point where Gendo's keikaku is anything but elaborate to the point of being paradoxically dull. There's no stakes if every single event of the plot is masterminded. Even if you tapped into some kind of omnipotence, it would be a smoother ride than the ups and downs Gendo crafted. There's just something inherently ridiculous about it all, and it commits the ultimate sin of a sequel, which is that you introduce a plot element that lessens every prior installment in retrospect. At some point, it becomes easier to apprehend as a meme or shitpost than as serious plotting. Like, Gendo is brainstorming with Fuyutsuki: "Yes, and then after making my son horny for a clone of his mom, I'll put down my next hand, a royal flush: taking advantage of my son's latent bicuriousity, I will pair him up with an irresistable labrador retriever-type bishounen. Is that necesarry? What do you mean, it's the most necessary! Plus, even though the bishounen wants to do the opposite of what he thinks I think I want him to accomplish, everything he does won't matter because I'm seventeen steps ahead." In NGE, Kaworu is at least sent by Seele. Why on Earth they decided to make everything arc back to Gendo is a brainwracking mystery to me.

A lot of the problems of Rebuild are in collapsing plots that only made sense as part of a larger, more episodic ensemble and smooshing it down onto either Gendo or Shinji. I mean, as of Shin the entire globe is side-lined down to really only a handful of people mattering (read: even being alive), and then even still, only Shinji and Gendo really matter. But then, somewhat counter-intuitively, more focus doesn't end up translating to deeper characterization. The more things Gendo encompasses, the less he becomes.

View Original PostWeird_ocean wrote:But this connection in the end not used to establish her character or tell any kind of story, it's just a mystery for the sake of mystery. And it is also incredibly convoluted. She doesn't show sings of recognizing Shinji in 2.0, but after the 14-year gap, that plotline suddenly appears. So, it adds another layer of the clone programming/memory manipulation. And it was also mentioned in 3.0 about Shinji's memories being erased.

Are you saying there's a possibility that the memory was, like, restored or recaptured? Or un-suppressed?

The problem with the timeskip is that I don't think a comprehensible series of events can actually lead us from 2.0 to Q. And what do you know, they never had to bother with making it exist and proving that right or wrong. The closest we got was the short with the pink hair girl, but if anything that made the setting feel even less comprehensible to me, at least in terms of character motivations feeling earned and organic.

Like, Wille knows certain stuff that they kinda need to know for the plot to go through. And I guess none of it matters anyway because, like with everything, there's the implicit suggestion that Gendo is stringing it all along anyway. Wille stood no chance of existing if Gendo didn't need them to for the sake of all the puzzle pieces. But that renders everything as some kind of carrot-stick game of benching a bunch of people who don't know any better ... except then of course the right thing goes wrong for the keikaku jenga-tower to come crumbling down and forget about it, the good guys win.

Except, like, it was already an unbelievable amount of winning on Gendo's part to get that far, so the win for the good guys comes across as equally obligatory and contrived. Nothing mattered because reasons until something mattered because reasons. Gendo was incapable of feeling enough to become ultra-Hitler until a thought that apparently never entered his head was imagined by a 14 year old, and that thing is, more or less, 'have you considered not being ultra-Hitler?' There's something so naive, hysterical and arrogant about it to me, this idea that moral superiority is evidenced by disagreeing with moral lapses, and that all we need to do is somehow package and deliver the right good-feel rhetorical pipebomb to someone who could, in reality, not be less interested if they even cared to try. And the implicit suggestion in the way the moral qualities of the plot are handled is that, if you disagree that redemption is still possible after a billion murders, you are part of the problem because you're not evincing The Type of Thinking That Matters, which is essentially just manifesting a sanctimonious emotion hard enough.

I don't know if that was articulated well or not, but the ethical/philosophical stances of Shin agitate me beyond reason.

To boil it down: Shin has a lot to say about how we should feel. It never shows anyone doing anything, though. What has Shinji learned about how to interact with others, other than flirt about breasts? We don't see a meaningful interaction with someone he's established to have performed certain actions with, like Asuka or Misato or Kaworu. It refuses to show us what it believes redeemed behavior resembles, just like it didn't care to show us the time-skip and actually flesh out a built world beyond aesthetics. Shin isn't interested in demonstrating to us anything concrete, and settles for vibes.

View Original PostWeird_ocean wrote:I was not talking about the photo, it was her dialog when she's talking to Rei Q "You know, your original was a lot easier to deal with." She is obviously talking about Yui here, because Yui is the original of the Ayanami clone series, which proves that she has memories of that time. So to me the whole Mari going way back with Gendo and Yui was established in 3.0 and Sakamoto who was part of the team, knew about it, and put this in his manga. That is my guess at least.

That's true, although it might still have been a big extrapolation on Sadamoto's part, and it only looks consistent in hindsight now that we're familiar with the "knew Yui personally" premise. Like, at one point Mari's character was some kind of double, triple-crossing insider agent, so maybe it was just a reflection on some kind of intel she had and that line in isolation doesn't imply actual face to face intimacy.

I think one 'lead' or under-discussed thing about Mari is like ... she kind of doesn't really exist? It's pretty universal that people take her as amounting to a metaphor in the end; she's 'the new' that Shinji is going towards after letting everything else go. But there's room in the text, I think, to take that read even further. Like ... isn't it strange that she's barely present? Shinji meets everyone on board Wunder but Mari is weirdly absent, except when we see Asuka, and Asuka is such a lonesome character that I find it easy to view Mari as having this kind of headmate vibe in those scenes. It's like how she appears momentarily in Instrumentality for Asuka to say goodbye.

And then there's her job as of Q. She's strategic sniper support. What if this is both literal and figurative? She's a broad metaphor for support, or for one's capacity to push forward out of pure grit. She motivates Shinji in 2.0. She's who Asuka has seemingly relied on to get through the timeskip. And she's who leads Shinji into reality in the end.

The problem is that it's inconsistent with her portrayal in 2.0. Her role with Kaji and her infiltration and information-gathering don't seem to tie-in either literally or figuratively. It just feels like her character was completely retooled.

But more on Mari being a figurant: I know it's a stretch, but bear with me. What are the scant other times she directly interacts with anyone? The battle scenes that open 2.0 and Shin, but in the former she's always separate; on the phone, not in a room with who she's talking to. She only physically disturbs Shinji later on. As for the battle scene that opens Shin, of course she's there, but if you watch it again, there's this weird separation going on where she's always isolated into her own frame, and even over the com-link, is kind of not addressed to the point you'd expect by name. So she constantly feels separate.

And the biggest one for me is that in the flashback scenes, there's this feeling that she's not really there--like she's been inserted retroactively, or is only there representationally. Does Gendo ever address her by name, or confirm her importance? Like, she seemingly introduces them (albeit only visually) but he never even alludes to a third party.

There's only Fuyutsuki, but she appears there out of thin air because Instrumentality is already happening.

Speaking of, this (and the flashback) are after she goes quantum in the battle. What if her going quantum is retroactive across the entire narrative? Maybe she subs for Quantum Rei in this iteration? What if she's newly in the flashback scenes?

Of course, all of this feels like it's too in between all of these possibilities to amount to anything. If she's quantum and is newly inserting herself, wouldn't that have some kind of altering-the-past kind of effect? I guess it doesn't matter, because removing Eva units also would, depending on how existentially it is we're talking about removal. Are they removed from the present, or is it backwards? A similar problem is like ... a new reality is seemingly being created, so then why show the gene pods landing, won't that get superceded? Or like, an entire film was spent building up Village-3, but is it even going to persist going forward? All we get to see is Ube...

Everything I said above is as close as I can get to making sense of Mari in a way that's at least conceptually interesting, except I think it can all be better explained as the writers wanting to segregate her because they didn't know how to integrate her with the old cast. As for having a motif of being figurative support, or feeling like she represents motivation ... instead of being this abstraction, it might be more of a byproduct of them using her as a plot device instead of a sufficiently developed character.
Après moi le déluge!

Weird_ocean
Lilith
User avatar
Posts: 126
Joined: Sep 22, 2024
Gender: Male

Re: Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Weird_ocean » Sat Dec 27, 2025 6:03 pm

View Original PostAxx°N N. wrote:There's just something inherently ridiculous about it all, and it commits the ultimate sin of a sequel, which is that you introduce a plot element that lessens every prior installment in retrospect.


I can write multiple stand-up routines based on this premise alone. And yes, it makes Gendo's character seem like just a mean jerk, opposed to his NGE counterpart. NGE Gendo was a calculating man who was willing to sacrifice everything in order to reach his goals, but he was never malicious about it. Some might even argue that he thought that he did it for the greater good. His action did bring Shinji a great deal of suffering, but the suffering was never the end goal. But Rebuild Gendo actually wanted to torture his son, and bring him immense pain just out of spite. Despite knowing full well how painful being an EVA pilot already was. NGE Gendo deserved more understanding and compassion than the Rebuild Gendo, because at least NGE Gendo in the end wanted to bring humanity into the EVA to forever be united in the eternal Nirvana of Instrumentality.

NGE Gendo was willing to drag Shinji through hell, but only as much as was necessary to achieve the goal. Rebuild Gendo is just a spiteful sadist who deliberately wanted to cause his son suffering. And somehow, Rebuild Gendo got his redemption arc and a sob story on top of it. Gendo was never a fan favorite, a good parent, or a good person, but he was never a psychopath. In Rebuild, he is just a monster with 0 redeeming qualities. And of course, his A.T. Field activating out of nowhere, demonstrating that he is "afraid of Shinji" although Gendo at that point was supposed to lose his humanity because of (enter a sci-fi psychobabble bullshit term here). And it didn't work for some reason? Because what, it was not a legitimate Key of Nebuchadnezzar but a Chinese knock-off brand?

View Original PostAxx°N N. wrote:Gendo was incapable of feeling enough to become ultra-Hitler until a thought that apparently never entered his head was imagined by a 14 year old, and that thing is, more or less, 'have you considered not being ultra-Hitler?'


Of course, a couple of minutes of conversation with Shinji was enough for him to conclude "I was the monster all along!" and this resolution is cheap as hell. If I remember correctly in EOE, there was no poetic pathos with unnecessary religious terminology like "To kill a God" or "Not being with my son was redemption." This writing is so bad lol. Seele is a religious cult, so it makes sense that they speak in those terms. But NGE Gendo did not drink the Kool-Aid and was more stoic in his approach and vocabulary. In EOE, Gendo just admits what he already knew. "I thought that not being with my son would be the best for him, because I know I'm an awful person." It did not sound like Greek poetry. He had a plan, he fucked up, and then he stoically accepted his fate. In Rebuilds, he's just pathetic, and honestly, that is such a downgrade for his character. And somehow, he still blames Shinji for rejecting Instrumentality in EOE? If he remembers EOE in the Minus-space, why didn't he remember when Rei told him to fuck off, and he was blasted by his wife and Kaworu for being a shitty dad while admitting it? What kind of selective memory is this?

View Original PostAxx°N N. wrote:Are you saying there's a possibility that the memory was, like, restored or recaptured? Or un-suppressed?


I honestly don't know, because again, those movies simply don't establish the rules of the world. It is the opposite of NGE where we have clear rules and limitations, and that's exactly what makes it fun and engaging. Rebuild lore could be summed up in one sentence: "See this cool shit? Yeah. We will never mention it again." But some kind of memory shenanigans is happening with Mari, because she even addresses Gendo with the "kun" pronoun that is used to address peers or people younger than yourself. She speaks as if she knew him personally. How exactly does she have those memories? I will not be surprised if they just never even cared to think of it.

View Original PostAxx°N N. wrote:We don't see a meaningful interaction with someone he's established to have performed certain actions with, like Asuka or Misato or Kaworu.


Yes, even when Asuka confesses to him, he's just silent and staring at a wall, and an hour later he becomes the giga-chad that playfully flirts with a girl he barely even knows. And all of it after he supposedly lost all his friends, Rei exploding in his face, the death of his parents and of Misato. Some people are not able to overcome this amount of trauma after decades of therapy and medication. Ridiculous. The problem is that without Mari, he would have disappeared and died. He can't save himself. And he becomes an adult somehow? Being an adult, I thought, was about being independent. Will he be dependent on women for the rest of his life? That's the opposite of growing up. And don't get me started on Asuka, who didn't change one bit in 14 years, and with a single mention of Kensuke is immediately saved and grows up. She has years of neglect, she shows no sign of personal progress at Kensuke's house (in fact she regressed significantly), and then Kensuke is the hero in shining armor who saves the damsel in distress? This is a disgusting disservice to Asuka's character, who in EOE took a stand, took her agency back, and challenged Shinji to grow up. And in Shin, her story concludes with "Yeah, just find a nice guy and you'll be fine." And I'm not even saying they are romantically involved, but that's how most people read this conclusion. She has decades of trauma and PTSD from decades of war, starting with her being a child soldier, and forced to participate in battle royale style competition with other Shikinami clones.

I believe that Kensuke was Shinji in the Minus-space, which is kind of confirmed when we see the Kensuke-doll costume in the studio. And despite being stupid, I can at least try to understand that Shinji just wanted to save her. But he used the same phrase with her as he did with Rei in the village, although the phrasing is different in the EN translation. In Japanese it's the same line: "Asuka wa Asuka da" and for Ayanami it was "Ayanami wa Ayanami da." So he couldn't even say something different for the girl he supposedly loved to save her. "Well it worked for one clone girl, it should work on this one too."

View Original PostAxx°N N. wrote:I think one 'lead' or under-discussed thing about Mari is like ... she kind of doesn't really exist? It's pretty universal that people take her as amounting to a metaphor in the end; she's 'the new' that Shinji is going towards after letting everything else go. But there's room in the text, I think, to take that read even further. Like ... isn't it strange that she's barely present? Shinji meets everyone on board Wunder but Mari is weirdly absent, except when we see Asuka, and Asuka is such a lonesome character that I find it easy to view Mari as having this kind of headmate vibe in those scenes. It's like how she appears momentarily in Instrumentality for Asuka to say goodbye.


Yes, I noticed that too. At some point, I had a theory that Mari is just the narrator-type character that just represents what characters think at the moment. But she is obviously real. But I think there are two obvious explanations:

1. She was written by Tsurumaki and Anno didn't want anything to do with her character. That was a deliberate creative decision by Anno to make her a fresh new thing that did not come from his imagination. Also, it was really hard for them to incorporate her in 2.0, because it was the remake of the NGE episodes. Although this doesn't explain why she continues being a third wheel in every scene in 3.0 and 3.0+1.0. So to me, it's more likely that she was retroactively added when the core of the script was finished, and then was given to Tsurumaki to add Mari. But my second theory is more interesting to me.

2. You see, Mari is shown as an anti-Evangelion character. That is not a coincidence because the only thing Anno said to Tsurumaki as guidance for her character was, "She must destroy the world of Evangelion." Well, there is a problem with this: Mari could've easily fixed every single problem and scene in Rebuilds. Imagine if she was present on the Wille ship when Shinji arrived? She could just say to Misato "Hey, don't be mean to him, he just wanted to save his friend!" or something like that. Or "Hey everybody let's just chill for a second and talk to Shinji, I'm sure he doesn't know a lot of details." Or in the village, "Shinji, don't mind Asuka. She is actually super into you, you know?" Mari can save everyone in Evangelion and THAT'S why she can't be in those scenes. Because in the end, we see how she saves Shinji with her cool vibes. She could have done that in every movie. "Let's just all chill y'all and enjoy ourselves! Life is short." And that's why she is never really there, because, well, she is the cheat code. By Rebuilds' logic, Mari is the example of how everybody should live their lives. She is the silver bullet, she is the element that is supposed to break the cycle. So, that's why she is never seen with everybody, because then the flimsy forced drama that these movies have would fall apart. If Mari was there, her niceness and boob jokes would just instantly heal everybody. Although of course, Asuka, being her partner for 14 years didn't change one bit, but, come on, 14 years is a meme. If you change them for 14 weeks, it would have been the same. Nobody seriously thought about what happened during the skip. Nobody actually thought of the implications of that. It's just a metaphor for "Anno tired. Anno making Eva long time. Anno break EVA formula, I guess."

View Original PostAxx°N N. wrote:Eva units also would, depending on how existentially it is we're talking about removal. Are they removed from the present, or is it backwards? A similar problem is like ... a new reality is seemingly being created, so then why show the gene pods landing, won't that get superceded? Or like, an entire film was spent building up Village-3, but is it even going to persist going forward? All we get to see is Ube...


Well, if we're going by Shinji's own words, "I will not reset the world or rewind time." EVAs are removed from the present, and the Village imagery confirms this. And this makes the Ube scene a memory of his father, and after that Shinji returned to Village 3. We also see Ube in Gendo's memories, so it makes sense for it to be a memory scene. But even with that in mind, this scene is the opposite of closure for me. The entire ending is Anno's mental masturbation dump, where he serves exclusively his own nostalgia and emotions, while throwing character logic out the window completely. I personally find this egregiously insulting.

Axx°N N.
Bardiel
Bardiel
User avatar
Posts: 752
Joined: Dec 31, 2020
Location: Up a tree
Gender: Male

Re: Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Axx°N N. » Sun Dec 28, 2025 4:19 am

View Original PostWeird_ocean wrote:If I remember correctly in EOE, there was no poetic pathos with unnecessary religious terminology like "To kill a God" or "Not being with my son was redemption."

That's always irked me and felt like a dissembling sleight-of hand-trick, as if using an esoteric enough word does some load-bearing for the fact that otherwise nothing at all is explained. Kaworu's loop sounds like it might have thought put behind it when they go out of their way to specifically use the phrase "vacuum decay," except not really. I mean, as a long-time Eva fan I've fielded many accusations that NGE & EOE were faux-profound, but I'll literally bite and rip and tear and die on a hill against that claim. Even so, I felt such a sinking pit in my stomach during some of the jargon-laden dialog in Shin, this pure panic of like, 'shit, were they right?'

View Original PostWeird_ocean wrote:You see, Mari is shown as an anti-Evangelion character. That is not a coincidence because the only thing Anno said to Tsurumaki as guidance for her character was, "She must destroy the world of Evangelion." Well, there is a problem with this: Mari could've easily fixed every single problem and scene in Rebuilds. Imagine if she was present on the Wille ship when Shinji arrived? She could just say to Misato "Hey, don't be mean to him, he just wanted to save his friend!" or something like that. Or "Hey everybody let's just chill for a second and talk to Shinji, I'm sure he doesn't know a lot of details." Or in the village, "Shinji, don't mind Asuka. She is actually super into you, you know?" Mari can save everyone in Evangelion and THAT'S why she can't be in those scenes. Because in the end, we see how she saves Shinji with her cool vibes. She could have done that in every movie. "Let's just all chill y'all and enjoy ourselves! Life is short." And that's why she is never really there, because, well, she is the cheat code. By Rebuilds' logic, Mari is the example of how everybody should live their lives. She is the silver bullet, she is the element that is supposed to break the cycle. So, that's why she is never seen with everybody, because then the flimsy forced drama that these movies have would fall apart. If Mari was there, her niceness and boob jokes would just instantly heal everybody. Although of course, Asuka, being her partner for 14 years didn't change one bit, but, come on, 14 years is a meme. If you change them for 14 weeks, it would have been the same. Nobody seriously thought about what happened during the skip. Nobody actually thought of the implications of that. It's just a metaphor for "Anno tired. Anno making Eva long time. Anno break EVA formula, I guess."

Yes! This articulates something I've felt for a long time without knowing how to put it into words. It almost makes her seem self-involved; or to be more exact, like ... isn't that just what it means? How does it not make her self-involved? She's got some weird degree of knowledge but seems unbothered to apply it--if she fails to intervene because something keeps her from it, we're in the dark. Why the hell wouldn't she be on Wunder's bridge, and why shouldn't it reflect on her negatively, instead of, you know, her being presented later as some kind of ethical standard-bearer? What is she doing instead, reading her hundred books? Speaking of, that's such a weird late addition to her character. It makes me think of Kaworu's music appreciation, except it doesn't really mesh or integrate with anything else except that, I guess, she has prescription lenses? Is it supposed to draw a connection to Rei Q? It moreso parallels Asuka's game hobby, but then it just makes that duo look like the tack some RPGs take where, in order to attempt to characterize hundreds of optional party characters, most of them are just, like, "he's the one who is sleepy all the time," or "she always has a lollipop in her mouth," or whatever.

Partway through Shin, Mari is presented during the final battle as this purely brave, purely altruistic character, in a way that feels like a ret-con. Her prior battle scenes, even in the same film, were more like an unhinged otaku wet-dream, where what she seemed to derive from combat wasn't eagerly sacrificial for the sake of others, but somehow ultimately self-serving. She seemed to be without even a millisecond of fight-or-flight setback, or self-preservation instinct, or anything that could stymie exemplifying a value statement or fantasy ideal of perseverance. She appears to get out of battle what people get out of ASMR, or literal sex.

But then all of a sudden she operates like the ultimate wing-man, and seems to be working out of a place of concerned empathy, and her radical disregard for her own safety seems completely for the sake of Shinji and Asuka.

I suppose you can say the point is that there's a straight line between all these things, and Mari is supposed to have been motivated the same way all along; her zeal for battle is incidental, or correlates in some mysterious way, or at least doesn't get in the way. But that I can even write that sentence is because ultimately I don't have a clue. All we know about her zeal is that she has it, not why or what it even really means to her, because it's merely exhibited. She acts on her own, is constantly siloed away from everyone else, and then she's a focal trump card.

I suppose you could say she's anti-Eva in that way, too, in that she bucks the tendency to externalize the inner workings of the characters, but that's like saying that serving someone a plate of nothing is a form of 'anti-cooking' food.

View Original PostWeird_ocean wrote:Well, if we're going by Shinji's own words, "I will not reset the world or rewind time."

But it's like a monkey paw or hair-splitting genie, because, like, you could say "an abstract ripple effect of causality" isn't a 'reset' or 'rewind of time' but it is a forward-backward alteration. Like, almost all of the Evangelion units are already gone when the wish is made, and they re-appear to be removed as if they're being erased existentially, and like, if the physics case being made about the anti-universe and fiction and reality is that there's a persistence of things on some quasi-eternal level, then what even is removing something seemingly ultimately? I don't even know. They attempt to use specific language but it paradoxically muddies the standing of things definitionally.
Après moi le déluge!

Weird_ocean
Lilith
User avatar
Posts: 126
Joined: Sep 22, 2024
Gender: Male

Re: Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Weird_ocean » Sun Dec 28, 2025 7:52 am

View Original PostAxx°N N. wrote: But it's like a monkey paw or hair-splitting genie, because, like, you could say "an abstract ripple effect of causality" isn't a 'reset' or 'rewind of time' but it is a forward-backward alteration. Like, almost all of the Evangelion units are already gone when the wish is made, and they re-appear to be removed as if they're being erased existentially, and like, if the physics case being made about the anti-universe and fiction and reality is that there's a persistence of things on some quasi-eternal level, then what even is removing something seemingly ultimately? I don't even know. They attempt to use specific language but it paradoxically muddies the standing of things definitionally.


The thing about the Minus-space, and the reason why the Adams, the Golgotha Object, and the rules of this world were never explained, is that it is simply a metaphor for Hideaki Anno's imagination.

There is no in-lore explanation for who the Adams are, but there is if we go meta. The Adams are simply an Ultraman Ace reference. It refers to the episode where the Ultra Brothers were crucified in the Anti-universe (a.k.a. the Minus-space) on the planet Golgotha. Anno said that this episode, with its Christian imagery being so foreign to a Japanese boy, had a profound effect on him, to the point where he did the same thing on steroids in Evangelion. So, treating the lore elements of Rebuild as anything other than self-insert meta callbacks would be futile. Because the movies themselves didn't make an actual effort to explain what it is, there is no choice but to go outside the medium. And when you do, everything falls into place. Gendo said that "5 Adams and 6 spears were found in the minus space left by someone before us." Well, again, just as Anno saw Ultraman as a boy, the "others" are the creators of Ultraman who left it in Anno's head when he watched the show as a kid. And that also explains why they end up in Ube. Mind you, it is not the present Ube, but a CG-altered Ube that looks like Ube when Anno was a kid. Some part of me thinks that Shinji in the end turned into Hideaki Anno's father (but that is a stretch). We can also see the old train car, the only one among the newer ones. That car is in a lot of Evangelion scenes, and is in Shiki-Jitsu. Explaining the Shin ending via the meta-elements is really the only option we have, because the movie doesn't give us any other.

Also, Gendo's memory scenes are all happening in Ube. So Ube is the town where Gendo lived and Shinji (Anno?) was born. And where Gendo left Shinji at the train station. That train station.

What is the Minus-space? It is a place where the Imaginary becomes reality. Well, that's exactly what the human mind is. We imagine things and then make them real. That is why the final scenes in the Minus-space seem like Shinji forever saying goodbye to his friends and all of them leaving. They leave Hideaki Anno's mind, his head. Those characters occupied Anno's mind for 30 years, and he was eager to expel them, exorcise them from his head. But Anno also wanted to make this a happy ending.

So when I came to this realization, I could understand Anno's train of thought. "I need to expel these characters from my mind and I need to make it a happy ending because I don't want to make people unhappy (that is quite literally what he said in the interview)." This is the premise.

And NOW I understand why Mari is there in the end. She was not created by Anno; she was Tsurumaki's creation. She did not occupy Anno's mind for 30 years, and that's why she is the only one who can lead Shinji into the future.

Another big part of the ending is that nobody can save themselves. All characters are saved via the direct or indirect influence of others. Rei, Kensuke, Mari—all save Shinji. It represents Anno's experience after 3.0 when he fell into depression and was saved by Miyazaki and Shinji Higuchi, who invited him to work on other projects and get his mind off EVA. And that's why Kensuke saves Asuka and Shinji is saved by Mari: because Shinji and Asuka both represent different parts of Anno, and Anno could not save himself. Again, this movie can really be understood only from the meta-angle.

Not only does he need to expel all characters from his mind, but all EVAs as well. But anything EVA really. The teenagers are gone, the depression is gone, the robots are gone, everything is erased from Anno's mind. I guess he wanted to set himself free (from the thing that was completely self-imposed).

So, to me, the only way to erase everything and still make it a happy ending would be keeping the world of EVA, Village 3, the same, and making Mari and Shinji return to it from the Minus-space train station scene. Otherwise, it is not a happy ending.

I don't think that removing EVAs from existence, after Shinji said that he will not reset the world or rewind time, implies a reset. It simply means the erasure of EVAs could happen in the present, keeping everything and everyone the same except the EVAs and the red contamination. And we are shown how the world of Village 3 is the same. The penguins, the spaceships, the water, the safe pods, Asuka's pod, and the Wille team footprints are all there to show us that the world didn't change. Yes, we don't see people, but that's only because Anno already erased these characters from his mind, but not from their reality. If that makes sense.

So the final question is: Is Ube a new world that Shinji created or a Minus-space memory scene? As far as we know, Shinji cannot create new worlds. And the spear and EVAs were already removed from reality. So, by the movie's own logic, the one wish that can be granted with one spear was already granted. I don't think creating new worlds was ever on the table in any EVA installment. (saying that, Rebuilds' lore cannot really be trusted, as it can be stretched infinitely, but at least I can go by what was not stated) Asuka at the train station is the Asuka Original who was left in EVA-13 after Shikinami left for Village 3. Rei and Kaworu said that they will not return to the world and would like to move on. So, the train station is literally and figuratively a transition zone where souls choose their path. "Asuka," Rei, and Kaworu are on the departing side, while Shinji and Mari are on the arriving side. So, to me, it's just obvious that they will return to reality after the scene ended.

Another clue is that the gasp, open eyes sequences of Asuka and Shinji are the same.

Both wake up in the Minus-space in their memories as kids.
Then wake up as adults (Beach scene and train station scene).
And then Asuka wakes up in her pod, coming back to reality.
I don't see why Shinji can't come back following this sequence.

Of course, I can hear gears turning in Anno's head when he was writing the train station scene. "How can I say goodbye to these characters when I saved Asuka, who returned to reality?" And that's when Asuka's Original comes into play. We never get a close-up on her. So it's the character of Asuka, but not actually Asuka Shikinami. Like an idea of Asuka rather than a character.

Axx°N N.
Bardiel
Bardiel
User avatar
Posts: 752
Joined: Dec 31, 2020
Location: Up a tree
Gender: Male

Re: Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Axx°N N. » Mon Dec 29, 2025 12:49 pm

View Original PostWeird_ocean wrote:So, to me, the only way to erase everything and still make it a happy ending would be keeping the world of EVA, Village 3, the same, and making Mari and Shinji return to it from the Minus-space train station scene. Otherwise, it is not a happy ending.

That's the thing though; if the intent was an overtly happy and straight-laced ending, why allow for plausible deniability? Why not explicitly show Shinji and Mari's return? Is this a byproduct of the obligation for Eva to be interpretive, and so there's ambiguous elements for the sake of retaining the series' identity? The result is something emotively positive but still, paradoxically, incomprehensible.

The alternative read is that they're not returning to the village, and that showing an explicit Cool World/Roger Rabbit-style 2D-in-reality is extending (and maybe one could say, drawing and quartering) of the metaphor. Anno is returning to reality, so the character of Shinji has to ... except because this bucks, like, any sense of continuity of the character as a character, it's hard to see it as anything but a metafictional fizzing out of existence. Is it apt to say Shinji is just Anno? I'm uncomfortable seeing it this way, even though it's what makes the most sense to me instinctively, because I think Shinji as a character is disservced if he's rendered into being solely representational, nothing more than author-insert.

It's a pretty general sentiment to view Rebuild, especially Shin, as being an i-novel. Detractors, of course, critique it as being something with an audience of one, as Anno making something for Anno to the point of detriment. But even enthusiastic fans of the film are, in many if not all reviews, also in that camp, and they explicitly say that their happiness is vicarious, and they often make overtures that they're 'happy Anno is happy.' I don't understand that at all and it strikes me as parasocial, but whatever. To be honest, any time I see that I can only think, like, 'so that excuses the crappy CGI to you?' How far can merely presenting a universally-desired emotion get you? All the way, I guess.

I've always had the inkling of it only making sense as being Anno metaphor, but I think your post is the first time I've seen these elements synthesized and made sense of from that (Anno's) vantage point.

And it reaffirms my feeling that what's missing from Rebuild is that, well, it inherently doesn't care about addressing the characters in a way that takes their reality seriously. Anno's reality supersedes theirs on all counts, and prevents them from integrating into a world that makes sense for its own sake. And that's not to say 'makes sense' doesn't come without confusion; this is a more abstract sense of self I'm talking about. It's taking a series that functioned as a coherent setting and grafting it onto autobiography to the point that it feels at odds with itself, and to the point that elements important to any plot that isn't autobio feel almost like 10 minutes-at-a-time red herrings, instead of being resonant. Like, Kaji's scene where he flirts with Shinji in 2.0 makes sense as 'trying to adapt elements of an older property' but it feels out of place when the series ultimately ends up being expressive of Anno's story.

Like, ideally Rebuild would look completely different if the premise was the same the whole time, and it was all purely expressive of Anno's feelings. Instead it's a bit of a chimera, where it's obvious that the goals changed each film, if not halfway through each film. Whereas the original dovetailed into its psychosis famously, it was a smooth glide and it was, somehow, more dedicated to keeping to a premise and network pitch. Even during EoE, there was still a tangible setting the entire time, and Instrumentality is the result of built-up aspects. But the phantasmagoria in Shin is a sudden new plane of existence, a mcguffin object, and all sense of reality, even unreality, is totally by the whims of the director.
Après moi le déluge!

Weird_ocean
Lilith
User avatar
Posts: 126
Joined: Sep 22, 2024
Gender: Male

Re: Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Weird_ocean » Mon Dec 29, 2025 5:13 pm

View Original PostAxx°N N. wrote:That's the thing though; if the intent was an overtly happy and straight-laced ending, why allow for plausible deniability? Why not explicitly show Shinji and Mari's return?


I assume, to expel all Evangelion from his mind, Anno needed to completely erase everything EVA from the picture, to the point where even the depiction of said erasure comes in the form of live-action footage, and not animation. And as we know, his next two works were live-action movies. Like I said, Anno had two tasks and not one. Not just a happy ending for the audience, but a happy ending for himself. And like everything else in Shin, Anno thought about his own satisfaction first and foremost, and what the audience wanted came second. And let's be fair, it's not like any other EVA ending was different in that regard.

View Original PostAxx°N N. wrote:Anno is returning to reality, so the character of Shinji has to ... except because this bucks, like, any sense of continuity of the character as a character, it's hard to see it as anything but a metafictional fizzing out of existence. Is it apt to say Shinji is just Anno? I'm uncomfortable seeing it this way, even though it's what makes the most sense to me instinctively, because I think Shinji as a character is disservced if he's rendered into being solely representational, nothing more than author-insert.


Yes, they are disappearing into nothing. As Anno expels them from his mind, they are already different people; even Shinji has a different voice actor for that reason. And I don't think that Shinji at that point represents Anno. Rather, I don't know, because we see this new Shinji for maybe a couple of minutes. And Mari being Anno's wife was debunked by Anno and Moyoco themselves. Shinji's demeanor is the happy ending part. If he is Anno, that is just for a fleeting moment when Shinji runs up the stairs. But he disappears like the rest of Evangelion in Ube's cityscape. I don't know if it was a symbol of Anno's internalized growth, but to me, being lost in the imaginary city of Ube, or an actual real-life Ube, does not seem like a happy ending by any stretch of the imagination. Village 3 is where all his friends, and potentially his love interest, are now. He could not return because he was still a teenager at the beach. He had no place to return to because he possibly didn't want to be the only kid left in the world of adults. But via his connection to Mari, his transformation allowed him to find the way back. Now he's the same age as everyone else. At least that's the only logic of the movie that comes to mind, albeit very forced, overbearing, and convoluted. But that's the only one we have.

But don't forget the great influence that Ideon had on Anno and EVA. Eva is like 40% Ideon, and if you saw it, specifically Ideon: Be Invoked, you know where the live-action film ending of Shin takes its roots.

View Original PostAxx°N N. wrote:It's a pretty general sentiment to view Rebuild, especially Shin, as being an i-novel. Detractors, of course, critique it as being something with an audience of one, as Anno making something for Anno to the point of detriment. But even enthusiastic fans of the film are, in many if not all reviews, also in that camp, and they explicitly say that their happiness is vicarious, and they often make overtures that they're 'happy Anno is happy.' I don't understand that at all and it strikes me as parasocial, but whatever. To be honest, any time I see that I can only think, like, 'so that excuses the crappy CGI to you?' How far can merely presenting a universally-desired emotion get you? All the way, I guess.


Well, that's why I hate Shin with all my heart. Remember how in the documentary "The Last Challenge of Evangelion" Anno said "Animation is pure ego," and when he was asked "What do you mean?" he answered, "Secret."

Hundreds of times I have thought about these scenes for two years now, and every single time the only conclusion was "It's all his ego. It's all Anno." That is why the lore and character logic again and again are just thrown away like trash. Nothing matters; lore, mysteries, characters—all of it is simply background, a pale decoration for the roaring pandemonium of Anno's bloated EGO. There is nothing else in this movie. Well, this and stupid action scenes that matter as much as the lore does. Battle scenes are there because Eva is supposed to have mecha battles. Mysteries are there because Eva is supposed to have mysteries. Asuka, Shinji, and Rei are there because Eva is supposed to have them. And that's why all of it is so superficial and shallow: Anno didn't care about any of it anymore. Shin is a self-serving dumping ground for Anno's life experiences and emotions. And yes, I don't care about it at all. I don't care about Anno or his little party at Ghibli, or Shin Godzilla, or his wife that he learned to enjoy food from. I don't care about any of it. Anno is not my friend. I'm here for Shinji and Asuka. And that's why I'm shit out of luck, because in Shin, simply nothing else exists. Or rather, nothing else matters at all.

View Original PostAxx°N N. wrote:I've always had the inkling of it only making sense as being Anno metaphor, but I think your post is the first time I've seen these elements synthesized and made sense of from that (Anno's) vantage point... Like, Kaji's scene where he flirts with Shinji in 2.0 makes sense as 'trying to adapt elements of an older property' but it feels out of place when the series ultimately ends up being expressive of Anno's story.


Exactly, and if you put that lens on and watch the entirety of Rebuild with it, you cannot unsee how hard it tries to be EVA, without being it (because it's new, so it's different), that it becomes a parody of it. And the worst one imaginable. For example, how they used Shinji's shower joke on Asuka. "It was funny the first time, let's do it again. And we can jerk off to it too." Or the way they used the oh-so-catchy-pop-song-while-horrible-shit-is-displayed trick TWICE in 2.0. "It became a meme and was effective in EOE, let's do it again and then again." Or how they just used the unused Rei's dinner idea from the original show—why come up with something new? Same with the discarded idea of Kaworu and Shinji playing piano and cello in the abandoned school. "Let's make a movie out of it. It's a popular ship, right? What, Shinji doesn't play music in Rebuild? Well, he does now." Although it looks like nothing but dull and awkward without Akio Satsukawa's homoerotic writing. "Asuka's ass? Let's just show it again. EVA had some fanservice right?" "Let's just repeat EOE, but happy." And so on, and so on. All of it is like that.

Seriously, I was so surprised that people defend this lazy shit. It's so low effort it's insulting. Not that the movies are low effort, but the approach to the story is.

Great directors need two things: Great scripts and great limitations. And Shin had neither.

Axx°N N.
Bardiel
Bardiel
User avatar
Posts: 752
Joined: Dec 31, 2020
Location: Up a tree
Gender: Male

Re: Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Axx°N N. » Mon Dec 29, 2025 6:20 pm

Rebuild is definitely in a camp of reboots that get by on how rarely audiences are aware of a writer's room. Many reboots will bring back few or none of the writing talent, and even when people hate said reboots for being bad, the writer's room nary gets a mention as a reason. Part of why uncanceled, long-running shows decay is because a writer's room is inevitably a revolving door. I find the cynicism of a producer that doesn't equate the quality of something to its writing staff to be gross, but they hold that position because they're right in that very few people know or care about unseen writers. Eva has such a reputation as an auteur work that it's completely superseded a wide understanding of the talents responsible for much of what was good in the original. I've seen some people shocked by the idea that Rebuild had co-writers and co-directors; there's a prevailing notion that Anno hand-makes every single detail, and I'm willing to say that a lot of that is intentionally crafted as self-mythologizing. Perhaps a lot of what falls flat in Rebuild is that Anno is laboring under an untrue assumption about his own authoritative power vs. the byproduct of collaboration that the original specifically was.

View Original PostWeird_ocean wrote:Great directors need two things: Great scripts and great limitations. And Shin had neither.

I'd invert this; I think it's more the case that it can be exceedingly crippling and poisonous when prior limitations and restraints are broken through, and then only you are sole arbiter. Dangerous to become your only limitation. Your own inability to reel yourself in, or impose restraints that feel concrete, can lead to a porous, vaporous vertigo of freedom. There's a reason the films feel aimless; it's a bad idea for a producer to be the creator. Takahata and Miyazaki understood this, and refused to put themselves into a producer role when Ghibli was founded. They knew that there had to be certain lines. It's ironic that Anno was 'healed' by Ghibli, when he committed literally the exact sin that avoiding it let that studio flourish. All his therapy-session did was inspire him with the need to pay homage to Ghibli, so that Shin is both a poor imitation of Eva AND Ghibli.
Après moi le déluge!

kuribo-04
Evangelion
Evangelion
User avatar
Posts: 3329
Joined: Feb 03, 2013
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby kuribo-04 » Wed Feb 25, 2026 2:10 pm

Thematically Rebuild is sort of a sequel, or at least a followup. So in that sense starting with imagery reminiscent of EoE makes sense too.

View Original PostAxx°N N. wrote:Perhaps a lot of what falls flat in Rebuild is that Anno is laboring under an untrue assumption about his own authoritative power vs. the byproduct of collaboration that the original specifically was.

He had collaborators on both but was also the director and main creative force on both.
And the myth that a lot of the iconic stuff didnt come from him was already dismissed by Satsukawa himself.

Dont know how a topic about muh lore ends in Rebuild bashing again lol.

View Original PostAxx°N N. wrote:Dangerous to become your only limitation. Your own inability to reel yourself in, or impose restraints that feel concrete, can lead to a porous, vaporous vertigo of freedom.



NGE's producer was supposedly very hands off, so I don't know this narrative holds.

the first time in ten years, some of them told the private episodes of those days. Producer Otsuki said he allowed Anno to do whatever he wanted in the anime except for the theme music

https://gwern.net/otaku

Like I remember him saying he was surprised seeing some scenes of the anime after the fact.
Shinji: "Sooner or later I'll be betrayed... And they'll leave me. Still... I want to meet them again, because I believe my feelings at that time were real."
Ryuko: "I'm gonna knock ya on your asses!"
-Asuka: THINK IN GERMAN!!! -Shinji: Öh... Baumkuchen...
Hayashida: "As game developers, our work is special. All of us here can put smiles on very many people's faces with our work."
~('.'~) (~'.')~ Dancin Kirby

Weird_ocean
Lilith
User avatar
Posts: 126
Joined: Sep 22, 2024
Gender: Male

Re: Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Weird_ocean » Wed Feb 25, 2026 4:44 pm

View Original Postkuribo-04 wrote: NGE's producer was supposedly very hands off, so I don't know this narrative holds.


Limitations of NGE specifically were the release schedule of a TV show, the limitations of animation because of Gainax's poor management, and because you can do so much with hand drawn pictures, compared to CG animation.

Limitation of time helps you make better creative decisions, as you don't have 7 years (in case of Shin) to rewrite the script 40 times. And limitations of animation pushes you towards better designs and better visuals, because somethings can not be drawn by human hands, and push you to make more creative and laconic visual decisions.

That's what I meant.

Darth Plato
Adam
Posts: 74
Joined: Dec 26, 2025
Gender: Male

Re: Rebuild 1.0: The mysterious silhouette on the hill

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Darth Plato » Wed Feb 25, 2026 7:47 pm

There were things I liked in the rebuild series, and I certainly don't regret watching it.

That said I agree "mildly" with some of what I read here. To me rebuild is a sort of "dream" version of Evangelion. As in, the whole thing proceeds with the logic of a dream. At least I dream this way: Something new comes along, and suddenly it was always about that all along, and it rewrites the meaning of whatever has gone before. But I also think the visuals are more dreamlike. You can only really enjoy it by not trying to figure it out. You just ride it like some sort of trip.

I will say however that my assumption was that Gendo had branching plans. If something didn't work out there was a plan B. I always saw the star wars emperor as doing that too, to a degree.

But still the plans within plans thing did seem a bit much to me. And I was nearly to the end of the fourth film when I realized these weren't even really the same people.I had thought they were going down an alternate timeline but actually no, they had different origin stories.

Having said all that I still had fun. I enjoyed it. It just wasn't on the level of the original.

If I could have my druthers, however, I would have the original Evangelion be twice as long.


Return to “Rebuild of Evangelion Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests