NGE2 Classified Information wrote:Details of the Human Instrumentality Project
D. In-Depth Information
While the Angels were being engaged in battle, people were also making and advancing the plan for the path that leads to divinity.
The first step is the completion of Eva — the body of a god and throne of a soul — via the installation of an S² Engine. The interfusion of souls follows. Afterward, our final natural enemy, the Spear of Longinus security device, is annihilated. Thus, that which is nearly divine, or perhaps a god in and of itself, is brought to completion, and, with the Spear gone, cannot be destroyed by anyone.
Seele's intention for this man-made god is to guide the elite (themselves) to state near that of God's.
While gchristnsn has raised several objections to the CI, this is the only one which I have been able to clearly understand. On the face of it, the last passage in bold here appears to be in direct contradiction with the show. I believe gchristnsn has objections to other parts of this passage as well.
This is something we need to discuss. But, since CI discussions always seem to get bogged down after a page or two, we need to stay focused while we do so. So, I'm going to abuse modly fiat and lay down some ground rules to keep us on the Topic -- Details of the Human Instrumentality Project: D
Because this passage itself needs to be put to the test, we need this thread to be a Dialectic rather than a debate. As such, I'm instituting a mandatory 500 word limit on all posts in this thread. This limit includes quoted text, so every quote you make takes away from your space to respond to it in. You can check your word count here.
This is a Dialectic. We need a lot of exploration, explanation, consideration of positions, and dialogue in this thread. To start us off, I'm going to open with the hypothesis that "HIP: D" above is in contradiction with what we see and hear in the show. The first thing I'd ask is for someone to explain why this is the case, so that we all understand clearly what the problem with the passage actually is. Only then can we proceed to explore it further.
(This is not how discussion threads are usually managed, but we need to stay on-topic here. Consider this an experiment in handling contentious esoterica.)