So, I'd like to try and make an attempt to translate a couple of the excerpts from these books that circulate on the internet.
Here is one discussing Murakami's "The Fascism of Love and Fantasy" or "The Fascism of Love and Illusion." This was posted
here. The website lists it as being from QuickJapan, but according to
this page, that volume of QuickJapan contained material published in "Schizo." The interviewer is Kentaro Takekuma, who is listed as the editor for "Parano" on Amazon.
One question I have about this excerpt is whether Anno is referring here primarily to the final version of Eva or to an earlier version. There is another purported excerpt of a roundtable with Tsurumaki, Sadamoto, and some others, where an earlier conception of Evangelion with a much stronger "oedipal" focus is briefly discussed.
There will undoubtedly be mistakes in the translation, so I really appreciate input/corrections. I left out one sentence I wasn't sure how to interpret.
---
庵野 『愛と幻想のファシズム』とか。あれのゼロが好きなんです。依存心の高い。村上龍も僕と同じで何もない人だと思う、すごく情けない人。
竹熊 すごく文体なんかもスタイリッシュでしょ。スタイルで読ませていくタイプ。
庵野 結局、そこでしかない。女に依存して自分を維持しようとしている情けない人なんでしょうね。
竹熊 村上自身を自己投影しているわけですね、ゼロというキャラクターに。
庵野 ゼロを否定しきれないまま終わってますよね。あれがまた情けないところが露呈していて、本人は逆を狙っているのかもしれないけれど、結局本音の部分がゼロに出ていて、すごくいい小説です。あとあれの中で、村上龍も依存型の口唇期だと思うんですよ。母親にやたらとこだわっていて、女にもやたらとこだわっている。女の胸で泣くって事にもこだわっている。あとはやたらと父親を排除しようと考えてますよね。エディプス・コンプレックスの話だと思うんですよ。
大泉 システムを破壊しようという、根元的な欲求がありますよね。
庵野 そうです。父親を殺して母親を犯すというエディプス・コンプレックスの話ですけれど、僕もこれをスタートするとき同じだなと思った。シンジが父親を殺して、母親を寝取る話ですから。
大泉 巨大化した母親(笑)。
庵野 ロボット-ということで置き換えることはしたけれど、オリジナルな母はロボットで、同年代の母親として綾波レイが横にいる。実際の父親も横にいる。全体の流れを司るアダムがもう一人の父としてそこにいるんです。そういう多重構造の中でのエディプス・コンプレックスなんですよ。やりたいのはそこだった。『愛と幻想のファシズム』なんです。思想的なところではこの小説と同じところはあると思いますね。あれを読んで、話がちょっと進んだっていうのはあります。一番感動したのは、あそこで鈴原冬二という主人公が、いまの総理大臣を殺そうとしたときにすごく父親みたいな感じがしたんです。俺は父親を殺し、日本っていう母親を犯すんだって思 う。それで日本を破壊して行くわけです。そのくだりがすごく好きなんですよ。あれが村上龍の本音が出ていて好きなんですよ。すごく。小説自体はすごくつまらないけれど(笑)。
Anno: "Ai to Gensou no Fascism." I like "Zero" [from that novel]. He is a highly dependent personality. I think Ryu Murakami and I are the same [as Zero]: empty people. Really pathetic people.
Takekuma: His writing style is very stylish. [His books are] the type you keep reading because of the style.
Anno: In the end, there's nothing else. It's pathetic people trying to maintain themselves, living dependently on women.
Takekuma: So, the character Zero is Murakami's own self-projection.
Anno: He remains unable to reject Zero. That also reveals a pathetic quality; the man himself aims at the opposite, but in the end part of his true feelings come out through Zero. It's an amazingly good novel. I think Murakami is also an "oral stage" dependent type. He is overly fixated on the mother, and overly fixated on women. He is also fixated on the idea of crying into a woman's chest. Finally, he is always thinking of doing away with his father. I think it's a story of the Oedipus Complex.
Takekuma: There's a desire to destroy the system [in Murakami's work].
Anno: Yes. It's a story of the Oedipus Complex, where one kills one's father and violates one's mother. However, when I started [Eva], I thought the same [way]. Because it [was] a story where Shinji kills his father and steals his mother from him.
Takekuma: A mother who has become a giant (laughs).
Anno: There was this replacement by a robot, so the original mother is the robot, but then there is a mother of the same age, Rei Ayanami, by [Shinji's] side. [She is] also by the side of the real father. There is also another father there, Adam, who governs the overall course of events. An Oedipus Complex within these multiple structures; that's what I wanted to do. "Ai to Genso no Fascism." I think there are ideological elements that are the same as those in the novel. [...] The thing that most moved me was [the fact that] when the protagonist, Toji Suzuhara, attempted to kill the current Prime Minister, he felt [the Prime Minister] was very much like a father. He thinks, I will kill my father, and violate my mother, Japan. So, he goes on to destroy Japan. I really like that passage. I like that Ryu Murakami's real feelings come out there. The novel itself is extremely boring, however (laughs).
---
An excerpt from Parano on Rei (posted
here). I mentioned it a bit earlier in the thread.
---
庵野 「実は僕、レイって、全然思い入れないんですよ」
「『エヴァ』を作ってる最中でも、ハッと気がついたら、僕、忘れてましたからね。
彼女の存在すら。七話なんて、思い出してレイのシーンを1カット足したぐらいです。全然思い入れがなかったですね。
そこが良かったんだと思います。
八話なんか、出て来ないですかね。一カットも出て来ない」
「六話が早すぎたんですよ」
「最後でレイの「どうしたらいいかわからないの」っていう台詞に、シンジが「笑えばいいと思うよ」って言った時に、
レイが笑顔を見せると。(略)後になって考えたら「しまった!」と。
つまり、そこでシンジとコミュニケーション取っちゃったら、終わりじゃないかと。
その瞬間に僕の中で、レイって終わっちゃったんですよ、一度」
「笑ったところで、もうおしまいじゃん、このキャラクターって」
Anno: The truth is, I have no emotional attachment to Rei at all.
In the midst of making Eva, I suddenly realized that I had forgotten her. Her very existence. For example, in episode seven, I remembered and added one shot with Rei. I had no attachment to her at all. I think that was okay, because in episode eight, she didn't appear. Not even in a single shot.
Episode 6 was too early.
At the end Rei says "I don't know what to do," and Shinji says, "I think you should smile," and Rei smiles. ... Afterwards, when I thought about it, I cursed. In short, if she and Shinji completely "communicated" there, then isn't she over with? At that moment, Rei, for me, was finished.
When she smiled, she was already finished, this character.