BlueBasilisk#802092 wrote:Ah, but if the woman imagines herself as pregnant, what then?

Stillborn?

Shamsiel-kun#790880 wrote:(where the hell could I find a realistic description of female sexual experiences?)

There are women here. Perhaps we should ask them?

Honestly I really don't care. I just thought the story was interesting. My personal view on the subject is that the answer is to remember the basics of internet safety and STOP POSTING YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION ON THE INTERNET. I mean, really, that's primary school level shit. There's a...

Shin-chan was probably embarrassed about trying on a bikini for the first time.

Has anyone read any of Miracles Jones' short stories? I can't do them any justice trying to describe them succinctly. Fair warning though, almost all of them contain explicit content in some form or another.

Two of my personal favorites:
Vitalics
Cream
[/url]

Chuckman#786331 wrote:2. What constitutes degenerate pornography?

Anything that eschews the proper partner, in the proper position, in the proper hole would probably be a safe bet.

Maybe when people learn to put their attention on more than one side of the screen. (Yes im still pissed that these complainers couldn't just tell me and instead ran to mods) That bitter, aggressive, and condescending viewpoint of the thoughts and feelings of others might be the reason ...

The browser does have access to the confidence information. It was originally included in the demo but they decided to comment that section out. Would anyone be interested in instructions of how to show it on the page?

I don't know. Right now the way I see it, the whole thing (or at least, the parts I'm able to take seriously) just plays as the ultimate cautionary tale. Be extremely careful of who or what you place your trust in. Don't just blindly follow orders from authority figures. Don'...

Out of curiosity, how did you find this service Reichu? Something worth noting about it: the API also returns Watson's confidence level on a score that the website is not showing. I'm going to poke around with some javascript later to see if that information is available in the browser and i...

My samples were all written in a fairly consistent style in the third person, are part of the same work, and use a consistent style on things such as grammatical construction, word choice, sentence and paragraph length, etc. I'm pretty impressed it picks up what it does given the small sample si...

I wasn't referring to who was at Misato's ranking, but rather the odd obscurity of the position; Misato was able to randomly move up one position in an orgnaization that is basically empty. Lets say for argument's sake that the position didn't exist before Misato came to fill it. Al...

Personally, I've never tried it. But if I were, I think I'd only go so far as to drizzle some honey over some of the more sensitive parts of the female anatomy, not the full Costanza of eating fucking pastrami on rye while doing the deed. Definitely don't use honey for that, the botulis...

I tried feeding it a few different excerpts from some fiction I am writing. This tool is terrible at giving accurate personality information of the writer just from a sample writing. With that said, it definitely hones down to the emotions that the piece is trying to express pretty darn well. Given ...

But I'm tired of tragedy . Tired of things always being 'dark and grim', and hope being a rare and depleting commodity in settings like Eva (this also extends to my opinion of things like the writings of Lovecraft, and to a lesser extent the majority of the Batman Mythos). Real ...

Thanks Reichu and ThanatosII. But . . . you realize not all explosives work like that, right? You're talking about munitions there, but that's not what an N2 bomb is. You're comparing apples and oranges here. Yes. Those are some real world examples that explosions by their nature are ver...

Nuclear Lunchbox#752252 wrote:Just go to the different episodes in the FGC and find when the Angels go boom.

But... that requires work!

I did a quick wiki search and couldn't find anything about it. It seems like a topic that might be worthwhile to stick in there,

Only one cross explosion in the show is associated with a death, that of Sachiel, whose explosion was different from other Angels in that it was willful. (Which possibly makes it odd that Tokyo-3 wasn't consumed by a giant glowing cross in episode 23...?) Every other cross-shaped explos...

When Angels create their massive explosions in death, the explosion is cross-shaped. The blast from Unit-00 was no such thing. (Now, this is different in NTE, but that's another continuum for another time.) I thought the same thing too. Not all Angels explode with a cross in the series ...

Akagi was concerned with the nuclear nature of Jet Alone, not the possibility that it might explode. The fact that Evas are in combat all the time is irrelevant, since plenty of bombs won't go off by accident unless they're properly detonated. But a damaged nuclear reactor is another matter...