Konja7 wrote:However, when I said I don't understand Reichu's logic, I mean this part: "she noted that the first interpretation feels much more logical".
Well, I don't know what Reichu meant, but for me it feels logical that there's yet another difficult translation throwing off English fanbase discussion.
I guess this means that Asuka replacing Toji and being decommissioned was a sort of poetic parallel or foreshadowing ... but what it also means is that Asuka would be replacing one of Toji's plot beats, and then one of Rei's plot beats, unless we're to take it that Rei still would have merged separate from Asuka. Now that I mention it, this idea is odd because of all the mains, no mention of Rei is a strange omission. Is her 'reset' as Rei Q reflective on not knowing quite what to do with the character?
I want to say I prefer whatever this would have been because it would fit better following such intense focus on Kaworu in Q. Except, it seems this plan was already jettisoned as of Q because Kaworu doesn't survive its conclusion.
In either version, there's still the same problem for me. There's a feeling of aimlessness to mixing characters up on the gameboard and swapping them in and out as an answer to the prompt of 'rewrite Eva.' I understand the franchise at large is full of alterations and alternate scenarios; the manga is a retelling with differences, many of the Eva games have many possible endings, there's the statement Anno made of Eva being a repeating story, and Anima is a what-if.
But I feel like it's not the best way to generate material, to constantly reiterate and perform creative post-mortem forensics and recriminations of finished material. Oh well.