Apologies for responding to so many posts, but I feel they all cohere into a broader point (and I've been in the middle of moving apartments!
)
nerv bae wrote:In my opinion, religious traditions and legal traditions inform ordinary morality, even outside of an explicit religious or legal context. For example, people generally agree that killing others is wrong, without always connecting that ordinary moral opinion to religious and legal prohibitions on murder.
That's an interesting point about real life, but it gets hard to apply to Eva for a few reasons, not least of which is that there are Gods known to exist by a few characters and the men who swear fealty to them have concocted (or influenced) all world government and thus, likely, all legal, moral and ethical aspects of said world, and our hero characters wish to reject this basis. Yet at the same time, the exact extent (in either direction) is hard to say. There's also the fact that Wille is composed mainly of scientists, some of which are aware of things like Eva Imaginary and Minus Space and the like; the morality at play from Ritsuko seems far more empirical than anything based on tradition or theology.
Having just come off a Thrice rewatch, I found it interesting that there are two moments in the village part of the film where characters pray, one of which is at Kensuke's father's grave. This is the only instance of practiced religion I can think of, but prayer in itself can be quite secular and only vaguely religious.
nerv bae wrote:I want to better understand the rest of your post -- regarding "I just can't follow from A to B," I think B for you are Shinji's actions at the end of 2.22. But for you, what's A? What is your starting point such that you can't follow to Shinji's actions at the end of 2.22? Is it everything that came before, or something more specific?
I suppose it's everything--A would be his initial extreme hesitation to pilot Eva, B would be him piloting Eva beyond its limits to extremely detrimental consequences. It's not that I think the films lack a dotted arrow from A to B, in fact the films are overt about the way they lay the dots down, it's that I don't think those moments pull their weight, the weight being me. Kaji's talks with Shinji and Mari's just before he mans Unit 01 are supposed to be the change of heart and epiphany moments, cards set down by guiding hands. But they're expedient and they're stand-ins for actual growth and development; I'm being told what gears are turning in Shinji's head, but I can't quite believe those gears actually exist and are actually turning. I suppose this is subjective, but I feel when Kaji and Mari have their spiels that they're really talking to, or perhaps more like at the audience, and trying to convince the audience of the character development in place of the actual development occuring organically; I would prefer if it felt, as it did for me in Eva of old, that Shinji was the one being convinced by the situations. In NTE we get exposition with nary a silent, gathering moment for characters; instead we get lectures interspersed with action sequences. I can imagine what gears must be turning for characters when you have Eva's giant smiling bandaged face providing a looming atmospheric. And I can understand that Kaji and Mari's talks are
supposed to change Shinji's mind on a dime, but I can't understand
how. Similarly, I can understand how Rei's "I wanted to grow rice" is tragic, and I understand that Anno is positioning her in front of Shinji and the audience for emotional effect, but I don't get why Rei (as a person in a situation) would do so.
nerv bae wrote:I propose that specific behavior is Gendo manipulating Shinji and Rei closer together in 1.11 and 2.22 to promote the awakening of Unit 01. And the Axx°N N. exception can't apply unless WILLE knows Gendo did that!
Honestly, I think the biggest component (at least for Wille) here isn't the manipulation that they may not know about, it's that Gendo is a major figure behind Unit 01's construction. Whatever Shinji did in this transcendent weapon, Gendo is the one who orchestrated it and hid and schemed who knows what into its purposes. Anything it does or doesn't do can be attributed to him or cast extreme skepticism on him and, too, the general fact of his scheming and secrecy. I'm not suggesting that anything and everything should be absolved under that umbrella, but it should at the least present Wille with ample room to question where the border exists between Gendo's machinations and even their own actions. But these characters don't really operate under the notion that everything they know might be put into question by the fact of world schemers; they're extremely rigid and binary in how they handle situations. To me, the setting acts as one thing (or should be one thing, given the presented premise) but the characters act otherwise or at least somewhat incongruously, mainly in regards to the Shinji question. Characters react with a "Gendo wanted Asuka to do X all along!" for the sake of shock value and to explain in the moment to the audience, but they don't seem to account for much in their planning or at least the camera doesn't care to show us; I understand this could ruin certain things such as the warships showing up by surprise, but specific expository statements ahead of time aren't what I feel is missing, it's more a general sense of possibility or alternate explanation.
nerv bae wrote:Is this adequate to establish that everyone in Wille shouldn't have blamed Shinji for N3I, because they all knew (via Kaji) about Gendo's manipulation?
Unfortunately I think we have to chalk this up as impossible to determine, given the time-skip and everything it obscures. As a later post of yours brings up, there are other areas (perhaps some unexplored so far) that might indicate what Wille knows, but that's all it can amount to with the material, indications.
For instance:
Blockio wrote:An interesting thing about that is that there are a couple of things kind of implying that in between N3I and 3I proper, there was a fair amount of political turmoil withinNerv; see Commander Nagisa, whatever Kaji was doing and a few other little things kinda hinting at a much larger bigger picture during the timeskip than generally assumed
This is an extremely good point and should cause some dissonance for anyone making assumptions here (including me) about what was or wasn't brought into daylight as a result of whatever might have happened internally or over the years afterward.
For that matter:
Archer wrote:If there’s any relationship between her and Gendo, it’s only barely implied, certainly not a major plot point like it is in NGE.
There's a high degree of ambiguity, also, to instances such as Ritsuko's EoE-like moment with Gendo; is it shorthand for "yes, things happened between them similar to the old canon"? Or is it merely an homage? The time-skip in tandem with prior canon nods presents an interpretive dilemma.
Gendo's Glasses wrote:Just because someone puts a gun in your hands (Gendo), and just because your superior officer is cheering you on (Misato), you're still responsible -- even if not in a legal or lawful sense -- if you pull the trigger, perhaps especially so if you do it while screaming you don't care what'll happen to anyone else in the process.
But Gendo didn't just put a gun in Shinji's hand, he manufactured the gun, perhaps--who can reasonably say, given his scheming and secrecy--clandestinely equipped with some kind of MK Ultra beam. What's more, an Eva is not at all like a gun; a gun is a simple weapon and everyone knows what it does. You can't say anyone, not even the engineers, fully understands Eva. Maybe if the gun was eldritch.