Dude, seriously, knock it off. Your attitude isn't helping here.
"Citing Lilith as the source of the Angels with no mention of Adam" is an OMISSION OF MATERIAL FACT. They're technically not wrong, they just left out the rest of the puzzle.
No, that's not true. They are very much wrong, as Lilith is not the source of the Angels. The source of the Angels is Adam. That part of the RCB is just flat out wrong.
They didn't say "Ramiel is the source of the Angels." - that would be an error in an addition of material fact.
It's just as erroneous to say the source is Lilith.
Any errors of additions of material fact? Going once, going twice? You can't compare the two. They fact that on two separate occasions, they went out of their way to TELL us who was on the show (as if they show doesn't make it obvious enough) is critical.
I'm glad you think so. But since one of those occasions is a film book from 20 years ago and the other is a DVD booklet I don't consider it a particularly compelling case.