[LAEM] Movie MPAA rating?

The place for all of the old Live Action Evangelion Movie threads.

Moderator: Board Staff

Fainne Roisin
Embryo
User avatar
Posts: 12
Joined: Sep 25, 2005
Location: Columbia, SC

Movie MPAA rating?

Postby Fainne Roisin » Sun Sep 25, 2005 9:32 pm

What do you think the film will or should be rated? For the amount of violence, should they rate it R? Or cut back on that and keep it PG-13?
I believe it will be PG-13 at most, simply to get more people to view it, as it will probably be very appealing to that age range.
I wish it would be rated R and show all the more disturbing aspects of it, however.

Also, assuming they do make live action EoE, how will they handle the masturbation scene? Does that fall under PG-13?

drinian
Admin Emeritus
Admin Emeritus
User avatar
Posts: 2712
Joined: Apr 03, 2005
Location: In transit
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Movie MPAA rating?

Postby drinian » Sun Sep 25, 2005 11:48 pm

Fainne Roisin wrote:Also, assuming they do make live action EoE, how will they handle the masturbation scene? Does that fall under PG-13?


I don't really have an answer for that, as the movie-ratings system in this country gets more disturbingly convoluted with each passing year (cf. the infamous one F-bomb allowed in a PG-13 movie -- any more and it's R, any less and the movie studio feels like they haven't fulfilled some sort of obligation...)

But I digress. If we're looking at this one specific scene from EoE, you have to remember that it is not only really there for the shock value but also as a criticism of the otaku culture in general. Live action Eva may not want to add these criticisms as they don't make sense in an American context; the scene will probably be cut in any case. Speculation is really useless at this point, although I would be interested in hearing others' thoughts on how the original series would have been rated if the American anime industry were to adopt the MPAA rating system.

Cultural norms seem to be so different between Japan and the US that even the most innocuous anime might end up getting an R-rating for nudity, for instance. The whole system really is broken in a lot of ways.

The Eva Monkey
IT'S OVER 9000!!!
IT'S OVER 9000!!!
User avatar
Posts: 9109
Joined: Jun 14, 2004
Location: The Evanets.
Gender: Male
Contact:

Postby The Eva Monkey » Mon Sep 26, 2005 8:00 am

I guarantee you they will make it PG-13. From a buisness perspective, they would be limiting a lot of their potential audience by making it an R rated film. They'll go for the same crowds that would go to a Spider-man or X-men film.

If you look at Box office trends, it is actually quite hard for R-rated films to perform, due to their designation. There are only so many really successful R-rated films in the box office. The films that TRULY defied their rating was The Matrix Reloaded and Revolutions. They really cleaned up, and I should hold the records for R-rated movies for a while.

Winslow Leach
Adam
User avatar
Posts: 96
Joined: Jul 09, 2005
Location: Hell
Contact:

Postby Winslow Leach » Thu Sep 29, 2005 9:42 pm

I'm hoping for a PG-13 for the first film to suck people in (the first half of the anime series is at PG-13 level anyways), then an R-rating for the sequel(s), if there are any made. Or they could just release all the movies in watered down PG-13 versions theatrically then release R-rated extended editions with all the violent stuff from the anime to try and stop the rabid Eva otaku from sending them bomb threats.

Hexon.Arq
Pilot
Pilot
User avatar
Posts: 2076
Joined: Jun 27, 2004
Location: The End
Contact:

Postby Hexon.Arq » Sat Oct 01, 2005 12:04 am

I don't really care for the prospect of an R-rated conclusion, though I'm all for R content. This is why I think they should just tell everybody they want to do Nadesico instead. Forget that Eva crap; too much red tape.

_you can't do anything, so don't even try
_get some help
_don't do what sonic does

BEsERk EVA01
Nerv Employee
Nerv Employee
User avatar
Posts: 1342
Joined: Oct 05, 2007
Location: Australia

Postby BEsERk EVA01 » Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:30 am

Ach. I hope they put it to PG-13. Because I'm only 12 and several of my 12-15 year old mates wanna see the movie as bad as all of you do. They're really desperate, I can tell you that for sure.
>>My User Profile On EvaPedia<<
>>Per Ardua ad Astra, Through Struggle To The Stars<<
>>Nothing<<

CitizenGeek
Ireul
Ireul
User avatar
Posts: 689
Joined: Sep 02, 2007
Location: Ireland
Gender: Male

Re: Movie MPAA rating?

Postby CitizenGeek » Sun Oct 21, 2007 7:17 am

Fainne Roisin wrote:Also, assuming they do make live action EoE, how will they handle the masturbation scene? Does that fall under PG-13?


Oh, I think they'll get around that by not having that scene at all. Seriously, they'd never, ever show a 14-year-old masturbating over another 14-year-old's comatose body.

Also, 'Fainne Roisin' ... is that Irish?
Last edited by CitizenGeek on Sat Nov 03, 2007 11:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf mutes.

BrikHaus
Dokutah Tenma
Dokutah Tenma
User avatar
Posts: 6301
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Attending Physician - AKA: Hell
Contact:

Postby BrikHaus » Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:35 am

I'm sure it will be PG-13 so they can make tons of money. Besides, it can still be awesome and be PG-13. It's not like Evangelion has much swearing, and only punctuated violence. The nudity thing isn't necessary, either. Overall, I think they could do justice to it with a PG-13 rating.

BEsERk EVA01 wrote:Ach. I hope they put it to PG-13. Because I'm only 12 and several of my 12-15 year old mates wanna see the movie as bad as all of you do. They're really desperate, I can tell you that for sure.

By the time they make this movie you'll be 25 years old, so it won't matter by then.
Awesomely Shitty
-"That purace has more badassu maddafaakas zan supermax spaceland."
-On EMF, as a thread becomes longer, the likelihood that fem-Kaworu will be mentioned increases exponentially.
-the only English language novel actually being developed in parallel to its Japanese version involving a pan-human Soviet in a galactic struggle to survive and to export the communist utopia/revolution to all the down trodden alien class and race- one of the premise being that Khrushchev remains and has abandoned Lysenko stupidity

NAveryW
Insect Politician
Insect Politician
User avatar
Age: 33
Posts: 5064
Joined: Dec 21, 2006

Postby NAveryW » Sun Oct 21, 2007 12:50 pm

Hey, Matt Greenfield might actually be dead by the time they make it and we can get a competent supervisor! =D
"Today?... hmm... today... right... Um... I'm just gonna wing it." -Guess who

CitizenGeek
Ireul
Ireul
User avatar
Posts: 689
Joined: Sep 02, 2007
Location: Ireland
Gender: Male

Postby CitizenGeek » Sun Oct 21, 2007 1:26 pm

BrikHaus wrote:I'm sure it will be PG-13 so they can make tons of money. Besides, it can still be awesome and be PG-13. It's not like Evangelion has much swearing, and only punctuated violence. The nudity thing isn't necessary, either. Overall, I think they could do justice to it with a PG-13 rating.


Yes, I agree. The first 4 or 5 volumes of Eva were rated as "PG" over here and the final volumes only as "12". So, I think justice could be done with such a rating.

NAveryW wrote:Hey, Matt Greenfield might actually be dead by the time they make it and we can get a competent supervisor! =D


I like Matt Greenfield. He done more than a good enough job on the dub, seems to have a genuine interest in Evangelion's "deeper" meaning. Both him and his wife seem to be very fond and very passionate about Eva ... isn't that better than dragging in someone who's never even heard of Evangelion before, forcing them to watch it a few times and then giving them the job?
I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf mutes.

Wevangeliwon
Tunniel
Tunniel
User avatar
Posts: 155
Joined: Oct 10, 2007
Location: Australia

Postby Wevangeliwon » Fri Nov 02, 2007 11:07 pm

I would say it is a PG-13 rating. You know, you're going to have to cut out the gutted Unit-02 . . . the masturbation scene would get the book and Cannibal-01 would be out, but you know, apart from that, PG-13.


CitizenGeek wrote:I like Matt Greenfield. He done more than a good enough job on the dub, seems to have a genuine interest in Evangelion's "deeper" meaning. Both him and his wife seem to be very fond and very passionate about Eva ... isn't that better than dragging in someone who's never even heard of Evangelion before, forcing them to watch it a few times and then giving them the job?


This is something I have to agree with. I mean, the dub wasn't stuffed with. Imagine if some kiddie company . . . oh let's say 4Kids took this and like One Piece thought it would be a great Anime for kids. Shawn Vangel, Ray Rilim, Alice Rice, pilots of the Evangelion Units, with all the deep stuff and violence cut out.

Gendo'sPapa
Committeeperson
Committeeperson
User avatar
Age: 39
Posts: 5599
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Gender: Male

Postby Gendo'sPapa » Sat Nov 03, 2007 8:32 am

PG-13 all the way. A budget as large as the film demands and the desire to do a series, an R rating would be financial suicide. Especially if the protagonists are so young.....bullshit, they'll be aged up to 19.

And the movies would (relatively) stick close to the series storyline while bastardizing the characters but would not in any way go for a climax like End of Evangelion.

If it stays true to its "Being more open for non-fans" than any live action Eva ending would be closer in relation to what Rebuild might offer.

EOE is not going to get a live action revision in any way people. The masturbation scene is the key issue but you've also got big naked 14 year olds. A Giant Naked Rei works well in animation but live action the concept is laughable (cough, At World's End, cough). Then there's the downright pessimism and end of the world.

EOE and the best parts of Eva have strictly come from teh insane, narcissitic and unfliching brain that is Anno's. Despite what ADV and their Propoganda folks are saying they're not trying to do an Eva movie cause they HAVE too. With Anno he HAD to Eva to find meaning in his life I feel. And thats probably why its his greatest work. He HAD TO MAKE IT.

With any live action Eva (and to be fair, Rebuild, don't feel that Anno HAD to make it) you're not going to see it be as wild, out there, and personal because no one in the production feels like they have to make it. They just know it will pay off.

Look at any artist. Their best works are the pieces they have to make or have desired to make simply because the story has shaped who they are.

So any of EOE popping up in a Live Action Form? HAHA!!! Only aspects I can actually see occuring are SEELE invading NERV and the Mass Produced Evas (without killing Asuka). Anything else is too confrontational for audiences to accept.

THE Hal E. Burton 9000
Elder God
Elder God
User avatar
Posts: 5751
Joined: Feb 03, 2007

Postby THE Hal E. Burton 9000 » Sat Nov 03, 2007 11:31 am

True.

Though IMO there is still a possibility (albeit low probability) that the insane EoE moments will be, in some way, depicted.

ADV/Weta then has to ask themselves a question...
Image
Do they feel lucky?
- TEH Fabulous Hal E. Burton 9000

P.S. For those wanting to discuss a matter with yours truly not pertaining to the general topic at hand, PM me. Please and thank you.

Fainne Roisin
Embryo
User avatar
Posts: 12
Joined: Sep 25, 2005
Location: Columbia, SC

Re: Movie MPAA rating?

Postby Fainne Roisin » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:32 pm

CitizenGeek wrote:Also, 'Fainne Roisin' ... is that Irish?
Indeed it is.

Gendo'sPapa wrote:Especially if the protagonists are so young.....bullshit, they'll be aged up to 19.

Oh gods, I hope not.

Gendo'sPapa wrote:So any of EOE popping up in a Live Action Form? HAHA!!! Only aspects I can actually see occuring are SEELE invading NERV and the Mass Produced Evas (without killing Asuka). Anything else is too confrontational for audiences to accept.
You're probably right about that--if they make more than one movie, they'll probably end up compressing EoE with the end of the series -- just picking out the "good" parts to use. A shame, that.
Because no battle is ever won he said. They are not even fought. The field only reveals to man his own folly and despair, and victory is an illusion of philosophers and fools.

Shiro
Scribe
Scribe
User avatar
Posts: 888
Joined: Oct 22, 2007

Postby Shiro » Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:19 pm

Gendo'sPapa wrote:EOE is not going to get a live action revision in any way people. The masturbation scene is the key issue but you've also got big naked 14 year olds. A Giant Naked Rei works well in animation but live action the concept is laughable (cough, At World's End, cough). Then there's the downright pessimism and end of the world.


Hm...I don't really think SFAiBL is the key issue. SFAiBL could really be skipped over without much change in the plot of the movie, it serves an intriguing character development, but it's hardly key. GNR, however, would be damn near impossible.

I'm betting on a variation on the Arka ending if ANYONE related to Eva's original production gets involved. Otherwise, it just won't work. Arka, Aluka, whatever the heck you want to call it, is really the only one of the ending scenarios that can be put into ELAM without butchery.


PG-13 is 99% for sure. NGE was shown on Adult Swim without any butchery (except for groping in 5), except voicing. EoE's only R-rated parts are SFAiBL and the boobs that go with it. Hell, if Xmen could get away with Mystique's boobs, GNR's boobs would be sorta passable, not that they'll keep GNR.

Ornette
Administrator
Administrator
User avatar
Age: 49
Posts: 11887
Joined: Dec 26, 2005
Location: Pittsburgh/New York City
Gender: Male
Contact:

Postby Ornette » Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:38 pm

Shiro wrote:Hm...I don't really think SFAiBL is the key issue. SFAiBL could really be skipped over without much change in the plot of the movie, it serves an intriguing character development, but it's hardly key. GNR, however, would be damn near impossible.

They pulled it off in X-Men, who had a girl that was naked but had paint covering her nipples.

Themaninblack
Potential Pilot
Potential Pilot
User avatar
Posts: 1769
Joined: Nov 19, 2006
Location: IL

Postby Themaninblack » Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:39 pm

They can just edit Shinji's Fap-tastic to a more suitable form...it would e quite easily to do....well that or out. of the Movie entireley...though it would be quite harmful .
I won.

Shiro
Scribe
Scribe
User avatar
Posts: 888
Joined: Oct 22, 2007

Postby Shiro » Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:41 pm

Yeah, I mentioned that later in the post. I meant that it would look ridiculous. I mean, think about it. A giant 14 year old girl actor painted white. C'mon. It looked dumb in Pirates 3, and it wasn't even painted one colour.

@maninblack: While personally I think SFAiBL was a bit much but a HUGE WTF, it's not necessary in ELAM by any means. It's pretty much taboo to have 14 year olds engaging in any sexual act.

THE Hal E. Burton 9000
Elder God
Elder God
User avatar
Posts: 5751
Joined: Feb 03, 2007

Postby THE Hal E. Burton 9000 » Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:58 pm

honestly though IMO, with the PG-13 rating basically morphing into more of a softened version of a R with every passing year, I think there is more that ELAM could get away with than we currently assume it would

Exhibit A:
Image
Don't get me wrong. ^This^ was still pretty good, despite the obvious changes from the poem (full disclosure: I am one of the biggest Zemeckis fanboys EVAR, BTTF FTW); but IMO, it was a miracle this film did not receive a R.
- TEH Fabulous Hal E. Burton 9000

P.S. For those wanting to discuss a matter with yours truly not pertaining to the general topic at hand, PM me. Please and thank you.

Shiro
Scribe
Scribe
User avatar
Posts: 888
Joined: Oct 22, 2007

Postby Shiro » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:33 pm

I haven't seen Beowulf yet; what exactly did it get away with? I've heard that a ton of times, so I'm curious.


Return to “Live Action Evangelion Movie”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests