thewayneiac wrote:What I didn't like about yours was that it didn't have any captions.
Bollocks. How do you think you can get away with saying that when all the previous versions of the article are accessible to anyone?
Here's the current page at the time of this post - http://evageeks.org/FGP/index.php?title=Rei_and_the_Moon&oldid=22620
Here's the page as it was three months ago as talked about in the opening post of this thread - http://evageeks.org/FGP/index.php?title=Rei_and_the_Moon&oldid=15032 - all the images have captions in that edit (18 Feb), the current article even uses the same captions for most of the images as the 18 Feb page. 8 hours later on the same day you made this edit -
http://evageeks.org/FGP/index.php?title=Rei_and_the_Moon&oldid=15034 with the comment -
[code:1]Argh! Please don't put all the images at the bottom.[/code:1]
and later again with the comment -
[code:1]Eliminated the "Gallery Effect".[/code:1]
thewayneiac wrote:I would certain have no objection to altering the MontageBox to put the captions directly under the images, instead of in their own section. This would make it similar to Dr. Nick's example.
Or the example above which you scuttled ASAP, only for your good self to come back 3 months later with practically the same page and you proclaim -
thewayneiac wrote:The current system was an improvement
- when, as previously posted here - http://evageeks.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=165266#165266 - all you've done is returned the page as it was.
thewayneiac wrote:Ok, take a look at the page and tell me what you think.
It looks a mess.