Net Neutrality Vote on Dec 13th! (#SaveNetNeutrality)

Yeah. You read right. This is for everything that doesn't have anything to do with Eva.

Moderators: New Moderators, Board Staff

FrDougal9000
Lilith
User avatar
Age: 21
Posts: 147
Joined: May 11, 2013
Location: Cork, Ireland
Gender: Male

Net Neutrality Vote on Dec 13th! (#SaveNetNeutrality)

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby FrDougal9000 » Sat Nov 25, 2017 10:33 am

So, Net Neutrality has come up in recent discussion again, and I've decided to make a post about it to try and help spread awareness.

To recap for those not in the know:

Net Neutrality is the idea that Internet service providers should enable people to access all content and applications, regardless of who is accessing it or from where, and without favouring or blocking particular products or websites. It is, in short, the idea that the Internet should be free for everyone.

Obviously, not everyone agrees with this idea; in particular, cable companies such as Comcast and Verizon have spent the last few years trying to stop net neutrality from becoming a thing, so that they can obtain even more control over what people can and can't access (consider how Verizon won't allow non-subscribers to use Tumblr ever since acquiring it this year). Because of the influence these types of companies can have on law, people picked up to what they were doing and began campaigning for the FCC to do something about it.

In 2015, after a long struggle, the FCC took action to rule in favour of net neutrality by re-branding the internet as a telecommunications service, therefore applying Title II common carrier rules to service providers. This looked to be the end of the struggle, with net neutrality coming out victorious and the Internet being free for anyone to use. However, with the FCC's new president, Ajit Pai (a long-time critic of net neutrality and former Verizon lawyer), taking steps to dismantle those rules and allowing cable companies the 'option' of not being total dicks to their customers, the fight has started up once more.

On December the 13th, the FCC plans to vote on dismantling those rules, which would be be awful for everyone who uses the internet. Even if you don't live in America, this does affect you as many internet websites come from America and will be affected (also, other countries might decide to take influence from America and choose to do the same, which will affect you directly). As such, we need to take action.

If you live in America, please go here and write to Congress: https://www.battleforthenet.com/

For everyone else, either share this thread or similar posts to people you know, or donate to websites like Fight for the Future: https://www.fightforthefuture.org/

Please spread awareness of Net Neutrality, donate to sites fighting to protect it, do whatever you can to help out; we need your help.

Thank you, and good luck.

-Jim McGrath/FrDougal9000
Pen-Pen died for your sins!

pwhodges
A Lilin in Wonderland
A Lilin in Wonderland
User avatar
Age: 71
Posts: 9442
Joined: Nov 18, 2012
Location: Oxford, UK
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality Vote on Dec 13th! (#SaveNetNeutrality)

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby pwhodges » Sat Nov 25, 2017 11:25 am

The 2015 decision didn't establish net neutrality - it was the default state of the Internet (and the FCC had fined a company that broke it as early as 2004, one year after the term was coined); in 2015 the FCC made clear that ISPs in the USA were to be regarded as common carriers.

Put simply, the ISPs and content producers both want to monetise the Internet more intensively than it already has been. The ISPs will charge the content companies for preferential access to bandwidth, and the content companies will in turn charge more to their customers as a result. The content companies charging is nothing new - and paying for entertainment is a perfectly reasonable situation. What will change is that the information and B2B users will be forced to accept an inferior service, or to pay extra, increasing the pressure to charge users for access to news, forums, email, whatever. It increases the probability of events (such as happened previously) where disagreements between ISPs can result in users on the two networks concerned not being able to connect to each other (to be fair, the results of this are so devastating that such things have been resolved very quickly in the past). It may even affect access by non-US users to non-US sites, as quite often connections between countries are routed through the US and would thus become vulnerable to having to join a new auction for bandwidth.

It would not be completely unrealistic to compare this with having all roads made into toll roads.
"Being human, having your health; that's what's important." (from: Magical Shopping Arcade Abenobashi )
"As long as we're all living, and as long as we're all having fun, that should do it, right?" (from: The Eccentric Family )
Avatar: Sad, sad Shinji... (details); Past avatars.
Afterwards... my post-Q Evangelion fanfic (discussion)

Guy Nacks
Test Subject
Test Subject
User avatar
Posts: 2849
Joined: Nov 28, 2012
Gender: Male

Re: Net Neutrality Vote on Dec 13th! (#SaveNetNeutrality)

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Guy Nacks » Sat Nov 25, 2017 1:48 pm

5 Calls is a great resource to use, as it gives you direct numbers to Pai's office as well as a number of secondary contacts and a script you can read from when you call.

https://5calls.org/issue/defend-fcc-net-neutrality
Among the people who use the Internet, many are obtuse. Because they are locked in their rooms, they hang on to that vision which is spreading across the world. But this does not go beyond mere ‘data’. Data without analysis [thinking], which makes you think that you know everything. This complacency is nothing but a trap. Moreover, the sense of values that counters this notion is paralyzed by it.

And so we arrive at demagogy. - Hideaki Anno, 1996

FrDougal9000
Lilith
User avatar
Age: 21
Posts: 147
Joined: May 11, 2013
Location: Cork, Ireland
Gender: Male

Re: Net Neutrality Vote on Dec 13th! (#SaveNetNeutrality)

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby FrDougal9000 » Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:35 pm

View Original PostGuy Nacks wrote:5 Calls is a great resource to use, as it gives you direct numbers to Pai's office as well as a number of secondary contacts and a script you can read from when you call.

https://5calls.org/issue/defend-fcc-net-neutrality


That link isn't working for me. It says "This issue is no longer relevant, or the URL you used to get here was wrong."

Has something changed, or was there a kerfuffle with the link?
Pen-Pen died for your sins!

Guy Nacks
Test Subject
Test Subject
User avatar
Posts: 2849
Joined: Nov 28, 2012
Gender: Male

Re: Net Neutrality Vote on Dec 13th! (#SaveNetNeutrality)

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Guy Nacks » Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:05 pm

It works for me, but it might not for you because you are not in the United States. The website automatically assesses your location so as to identify who your representatives in Congress are so that they can supply you with their office numbers.

Try to go to the main site at https://5calls.org and navigate to the Demand the FCC Maintain Net Neutrality button on the left.
Among the people who use the Internet, many are obtuse. Because they are locked in their rooms, they hang on to that vision which is spreading across the world. But this does not go beyond mere ‘data’. Data without analysis [thinking], which makes you think that you know everything. This complacency is nothing but a trap. Moreover, the sense of values that counters this notion is paralyzed by it.

And so we arrive at demagogy. - Hideaki Anno, 1996

pwhodges
A Lilin in Wonderland
A Lilin in Wonderland
User avatar
Age: 71
Posts: 9442
Joined: Nov 18, 2012
Location: Oxford, UK
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality Vote on Dec 13th! (#SaveNetNeutrality)

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby pwhodges » Sat Nov 25, 2017 7:02 pm

I had the same, but enabling a US-linked VPN got the page to come up for me. If you don't have a VPN, use the Opera browser which has one built in (you have to enable it in the Settings before the on/off button for it appears).
"Being human, having your health; that's what's important." (from: Magical Shopping Arcade Abenobashi )
"As long as we're all living, and as long as we're all having fun, that should do it, right?" (from: The Eccentric Family )
Avatar: Sad, sad Shinji... (details); Past avatars.
Afterwards... my post-Q Evangelion fanfic (discussion)

Alaska Slim
Frigus Ignoramus
Frigus Ignoramus
User avatar
Posts: 4832
Joined: Oct 08, 2007
Location: The Land Up Over
Gender: Male

Re: Net Neutrality Vote on Dec 13th! (#SaveNetNeutrality) Bl

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Alaska Slim » Thu Nov 30, 2017 1:03 pm

View Original Postpwhodges wrote:The 2015 decision didn't establish net neutrality - it was the default state of the Internet (and the FCC had fined a company that broke it as early as 2004, one year after the term was coined); in 2015 the FCC made clear that ISPs in the USA were to be regarded as common carriers.

Put simply, the ISPs and content producers both want to monetise the Internet more intensively than it already has been. The ISPs will charge the content companies for preferential access to bandwidth, and the content companies will in turn charge more to their customers as a result. The content companies charging is nothing new - and paying for entertainment is a perfectly reasonable situation. What will change is that the information and B2B users will be forced to accept an inferior service, or to pay extra,

Business-class internet/dedicated lines is already a feature companies sell, has been for years. It generates innovation the same way commercial-grade computer hardware does.

Furthermore, the ISPs aren't without their own pressures to keep them honest; any high-handedness will just incentivize companies to get Google Fiber or its imitators into their area of business. Or any number of spectrum internet delivery options, assuming they don't have a pervasive reason to need the performance of a physical line.

It's precisely because it's Businesses who stand to lose the most here, that you can bet they'll spend the money to build new infrastructure, if that's what the current ISPs force them into.

The new guys in wired ISP don't even have to be that innovative to be competitive, all they really need to do is get a city to allow them to use publicly owned “rights of way” points while waiving usage fees. Every time that's happened, towns spring up new infrastructure virtually overnight.
"It's all fun and games till one of you gets my foot up your ass." - FofR, TrivialBeing.net Webmaster

"I blame teenage girls for everything." - Dr. Dave

"God is in his Heaven, and free men walk upon the Earth" - Rev. Robert Sirico, President of the Acton Institute

Ornette
Administrator
Administrator
User avatar
Age: 43
Posts: 11736
Joined: Dec 26, 2005
Location: Pittsburgh/New York City
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Net Neutrality Vote on Dec 13th! (#SaveNetNeutrality)

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Ornette » Fri Dec 01, 2017 3:22 pm

I've had both business class services as well as dedicated fiber, and the difference is really laughably negligible. What it really means is a slightly higher SLA meaning mostly that they promise you will be down less frequently, and you pay roughly 3 or 4x the residential cost, with really no noticeable difference in service. With a recent ISP that I got business class service from, it was close to 10x the residential cost, with absolutely no difference in service except I got a pool of fixed IP addresses. Why pay 10x? They were the only service provider, with no other ISP in the area, it was their deal or no deal. I seriously, seriously question what kind of innovation the business class (for both cable and FIOS, I've had them both) really provide, as they run on the same infrastructure, with some promise of better SLA but the internet goes down everytime all the residential customers go down.

The majority of the innovation happens at the mass traffic level, not at the pleebs that have to pay the only company offering internet service in their area. This is the large scale infrastructure that runs through the largest content providers, I suppose they can ultimately be charging them extra money, one of the reasons so many content providers are so against removing of the rules.

It's still important to keep in mind that while the concept of net neutrality is pretty simple and makes sense, the literal implementation of any rules is not. There's a lot of existing infrastructure that make some lines blurry: QOS and CDNs all kind of make it seem like they're not content neutral (for good reason). Filtering content because you're sharing internet on an airplane makes perfect sense but is that neutral?
Paganini's 14th Caprice in Eb Maj - recordings from 2004 -Vinyl collection at Discogs.
I have a haiku,
Okay, Okay, here it is,
damn, I forgot it

Chuckman
Chuckman
Chuckman
User avatar
Age: 34
Posts: 8297
Joined: Nov 11, 2011
Location: Chuckman

Re: Net Neutrality Vote on Dec 13th! (#SaveNetNeutrality) Bl

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Chuckman » Thu Dec 07, 2017 4:39 pm

View Original PostAlaska Slim wrote:Business-class internet/dedicated lines is already a feature companies sell, has been for years. It generates innovation the same way commercial-grade computer hardware does.

Furthermore, the ISPs aren't without their own pressures to keep them honest; any high-handedness will just incentivize companies to get Google Fiber or its imitators into their area of business. Or any number of spectrum internet delivery options, assuming they don't have a pervasive reason to need the performance of a physical line.

It's precisely because it's Businesses who stand to lose the most here, that you can bet they'll spend the money to build new infrastructure, if that's what the current ISPs force them into.

The new guys in wired ISP don't even have to be that innovative to be competitive, all they really need to do is get a city to allow them to use publicly owned “rights of way” points while waiving usage fees. Every time that's happened, towns spring up new infrastructure virtually overnight.


ISPs have monopolies and maintain regulatory capture (especially by exclusivity contracts with municipalities in exchange for building infrastructure) and the benefits of a free and open internet with high speed and reliability is too great to leave in private hands. Especially after the ISPs made deals for funding to expand broadband and just kept the money.

Somehow when private industry promises to do a thing in exchange for money from the government and then just takes the money, it's actually the governments fault and it proves how the cheating thieves are the ones who should be left to control everything. For profit.

Chuckman
Chuckman
Chuckman
User avatar
Age: 34
Posts: 8297
Joined: Nov 11, 2011
Location: Chuckman

Re: Net Neutrality Vote on Dec 13th! (#SaveNetNeutrality)

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Chuckman » Thu Dec 07, 2017 5:00 pm

Also, here is a list of things that ISPs have tried to do that would be permissible without a Net Neutrality doctrine. Several of them are illustrative of how ISPs could, individually or by collusion, stifle technological growth by throttling or blocking traffic.

https://www.reddit.com/r/KeepOurNetFree ... h=45a33b81


Return to “Completely and Utterly Off-Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests