What Makes Something Canon?

Notable old Evangelion threads from the AnimeNation Forums are preserved here.

Moderators: Monk Ed, Ornette

Fuzzy Chickens [ANF]
Shamshel
Shamshel
User avatar
Posts: 289
Joined: Oct 19, 2007

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Fuzzy Chickens [ANF] » Sat Oct 20, 2007 1:40 pm

Reichu wrote:There is a difference between "canon" and "Gratuitous OOC Fanboy Service".



What? There is? When did this happen?

Originally posted on: 11-Mar-2004, 01:02 GMT

Reichu [ANF]
Angel
Angel
User avatar
Posts: 3651
Joined: Oct 19, 2007

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Reichu [ANF] » Sat Oct 20, 2007 1:40 pm

May as well bump this, while quoting the "hierarchy of canonicity" (is that a word?) that Shin-seiki typed up in a more recent thread:

Shin-seiki wrote:The consensus around here is that [the RCB] is reliable, except, well, when it isn't... In other words, feel free to quote it to back up an argument, except for a very few inexplicable flubs where it is directly contradicted by the evidence of the show itself. The hierarchy of canonicity goes something like this:
1: What is said and shown in the series/movies. The New Production Cut and EoE are the "final" version, and thus supercede the broadcast version in canonicity, in any theoretical divergence between the two.
2: The words of Anno himself, and of other senior members of the NGE team at GAINAX.
3: Supplemental published sources officially sanctioned by GAINAX, such as the RCB, the various Newtype filmbooks, and the Cardass Masters card game, etc.
4: The manga by Sadamoto. The manga is basically canon only with reference to itself, but may be referenced in those areas where it offers more detailed info on subjects that the series is vague about, such as the background of SEELE, as long as it doesn't actually contradict the facts as presented in the series.
5: Least reliable is the stuff that ADV (or VIZ, for that matter) came up with that they put on the packaging and other promotional materials.



Originally posted on: 05-Mar-2005, 14:27 GMT

Mr. Tines [ANF]
Bardiel
Bardiel
User avatar
Posts: 787
Joined: Oct 19, 2007

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Mr. Tines [ANF] » Sat Oct 20, 2007 1:40 pm

Reichu wrote:May as well bump this, while quoting the "hierarchy of canonicity" (is that a word?) that Shin-seiki typed up in a more recent thread:



Yes

Main Entry: can·on·ic·i·ty
Pronunciation: "ka-n&-'ni-s&-tE
Function: noun
: the quality or state of being canonical

Originally posted on: 05-Mar-2005, 15:18 GMT

Treize X [ANF]
Clockiel
Clockiel
User avatar
Posts: 411
Joined: Oct 19, 2007

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Treize X [ANF] » Sat Oct 20, 2007 1:40 pm

tv33 wrote:If someone was going to like a show based solely on fan serves there are plenty of other show with about a million times as much. *cough*Najica*cough*



LOL, yes indeed. I remember buying Najica solely to laugh every time they threw in fanservice near pointlessly. XD

As for the subject...canon is something you define for yourself, most of the time. I find anything within the series is technically canon.


Originally posted on: 05-Mar-2005, 15:26 GMT

Reichu [ANF]
Angel
Angel
User avatar
Posts: 3651
Joined: Oct 19, 2007

  •      
  •      
  • Quote

Postby Reichu [ANF] » Sat Oct 20, 2007 1:40 pm

If there aren't established parameters of what is canon and what isn't, then you get people like Fuzzy Chickens. Image

Originally posted on: 05-Mar-2005, 18:46 GMT


Return to “AnimeNation Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests